Oh btw, cubdog, those SS-M7"s are on my list of speaks I want to own, they look awesome, and were Sony"s best effort I am told. I have only seen one set for sale and they were trashed, and he still wanted 500. How did you come about yours, did you get a good deal, post some pics.......Roost
My Magnapan MMGs definitely NEED a sub. That said, the passive Phase Tech sub I have paired with them integrates beautifully, and lets the Maggies really sing in the mids and highs.
Now I'll try not to ruffle any feathers, but many here probably won't like what I'm about to say. There are VERY FEW subwoofers, no less full range speakers, that will put out a clean 20Hz. That's not to say that everyone needs 20Hz, or that everyone needs a sub. There are LOTS of very good sounding speakers that will give you plenty of bass. Be happy with them and enjoy them - but don't fool yourself into thinking that they're performing down to 20 Hz, no matter what the manufacturer says. Going down to 20Hz is pretty easy, but doing it without gobs of distortion is not. Many manufacturers claim a wide frequency response, but never tell you how much distortion is introduced. Most people - even audiophiles - have never heard truly clean bass, so they've learned to identify that low frequency distortion that they're used to hearing as their benchmark.
Not to toot my own horn, but to give a point of reference, I have run recording studios, worked live sound, done pro installations, and the only sub I would really recommend for clean 20Hz (and below) output is the Servodrive Contrabass, designed by Tom Danley. I have met Tom, and worked an install with his input, and this thing is the real deal. When George Lucas put a pair in his personal theater, his reaction was "How long ago could I have gotten these things?" There may be others on the market now that can match their performance (I've been out of the field for a few years), but I'm always very very dubious of claims of low frequency performance - especially when there is no mention of distortion.

I agree with a lot of this, but I think the biggest issue is that, while most if not all woofers will actually play a 20hz tone, the problem is, very very few can so at even modest output levels. The amount of power and excursion it takes to produce a 20hz tone at say 100, or even 90 db is simply more than most "full range" towers are designed to do.
Then of course there are room acoustics to deal with, not to even mention the fact that nearly no music has 20hz bass. I know some music does, but the vast majority of music does not. I know no main stream music does. Most peoples idea of low bass is probably more in the range of 40hz, not 20hz like they may think.
It seems like some people think it's an insult to their speakers to even suggest they'd benefit from subwoofers. I say subwoofers, because I think single subs often end up sounding bad in many setups. And if some don't take it as an insult, they've simply only heard bad execution of subwoofers and now have completely written them off. It's not like a subwoofer adds bass that isn't in the recording, it simply plays what's present, exactly like a tweeter does, except at the opposite end of the spectrum. If anyone is aware of the sub in their system, then I'd say it's running too loud and needs to be adjusted. Subwoofers definitely aren't something you just plop in a corner, crank the volume up and you're done. They take some pretty careful adjustments and tweaking, but the results are well worth it.
I've heard bass sounds are "non-directional." Does anyone deem a sub-woofer per channel advantageous?
I've heard bass sounds are "non-directional." Does anyone deem a sub-woofer per channel advantageous?