JBL GUY
Addicted Member
Quote:
SOTA
Yes, I am quite familiar with it's construction.
It uses 4 1/8 wave elements and a switching network to achieve directionality and an adjustable matching/tuning network.
It's directionality can be useful for reducing multipath interference, although with only 4 directional positions, putting it in a wooden lazy Susan, to fine tune the directionality is not a bad idea.
When I was doing a lot of traveling, I designed and built both 2 meter (146 MHz) and 440 mHz versions as portable travel antennae just for a project and something to do.
I have actually taken the FM 8 and FM 10 versions to the antenna test range and compared them to a reference dipole and a reference 1/4 wave ground plane antennae.
Note, I did not say it is a bad antenna. It has it's applications and as I have said many times, when it comes to antennae, it is location, location, location when it comes to choosing an antenna.
Originally Posted by JBL GUY View Post
Some people have had satisfactory performance from the BIC Beam Boxes.
SOTA
I love my FM 10, really good antenna. Ever see inside one?...
Yes, I am quite familiar with it's construction.
It uses 4 1/8 wave elements and a switching network to achieve directionality and an adjustable matching/tuning network.
It's directionality can be useful for reducing multipath interference, although with only 4 directional positions, putting it in a wooden lazy Susan, to fine tune the directionality is not a bad idea.
When I was doing a lot of traveling, I designed and built both 2 meter (146 MHz) and 440 mHz versions as portable travel antennae just for a project and something to do.
I have actually taken the FM 8 and FM 10 versions to the antenna test range and compared them to a reference dipole and a reference 1/4 wave ground plane antennae.
Note, I did not say it is a bad antenna. It has it's applications and as I have said many times, when it comes to antennae, it is location, location, location when it comes to choosing an antenna.
