• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html
heathkit w5m - t03.jpeg
chassis hot spots with the cage installed

heathkit w5m - t04.jpeg
they should have focused on covering the tubes only instead of cooking the power magnetics and multi-caps

heathkit w5m - t05.jpeg
no cables side
 
heathkit w5m - t06.jpeg
with the top down, lots of hot spot reflections

heathkit w5m - t07.jpeg
some thermal info about the mains-txf although too much reflection from v1/v2

heathkit w5m - t08.jpeg
outputs too close to everything else, not such a good idea and yet a vintage norm...

not sure about the rectifier in the back, its starting to warm up to slightly above room temp (oh the horror). at least the disconnected factory multi-caps are not getting cooked to death on 2 sides, just one. all senseless snarking aside, its interesting to see the modified thermal footprint on the tube deck. since there are a few chassis mount resistors in action that dont normally exist.
 
some type of tube cage would be a good idea either for both pairs of fire together or one cage per pair like a salt & pepper shaker carrier.

Screenshot 2026-08-23 at 22-09-35 salt and pepper shaker carrier at DuckDuckGo.png

something made of 1950's sourced materials plus a stylish handle. obviously tall mesh walls for full effect/protection. maybe retain the pattern of the original full cage/cover, just random ideas...
 
I've never seen a tube amp with that sort of cover arrangement. It was all or nothing, with the idea of hiding and keeping everything far away from the bits inside. Would be interesting to see what it looks like after an hour with the cover on vs cover off to see how much extra heat it actually retains. It may not be enough difference to really matter.

but generally I agree that thermal management on most old amps is not ideal, though everything ran hot back then so maybe it was just considered less of a problem. Those caps often lasted decades despite being placed where they cooked constantly.
 
heathkit w5m - t09.jpeg
closer look at the mains-txf, v1/v2 hot spot reflections

heathkit w5m - t10.jpeg
top is noticeably hot, not surprising with around 80w of heating potential

heathkit w5m - t11.jpeg
base is a little cooler, used a chunk of cardboard to block out any reflections

0.3 meters = 11.8 inches, camera distance is probably closer than that (temps slightly higher vs actual). emissivity of 0.93 vs txf shell surface shouldnt be too far off. room temp is probably near 73f.
 
heathkit w5m - t12.jpeg
interesting to note one of the bass-balance test sockets is hotter than the other.

short distance of wire connecting the output tube socket cathode has no problem conducting heat quite efficiently.

v1.0 final schematics next.
 
00 - v1_0 sch p1.png
page-1, not perfect but it doesnt need to be. re-re-adjusted a few things and settled on the above values. an establish reference point to compare future modz with.

interesting to note, when bumping up the cap feeding v1 pins 1 & 7 it also translates to more power-off pop potential (sabotaging front end loading). adjusting v1 pin 3 cathode resistor higher helps to compensate, also allows for higher input volume before distortion starts to limit performance/quality. overall low frequency stability has improved vs the initial 1u/1u/1u and deleting the three little caps (multi cap) completely.

it would be interesting to add a 330k 1w in parallel with the now 4.7uf cap to possibly eliminate power-off pop / woofer (-)excursion without dialing up the current through v1.1 beyond 5.2ma (into reduced lifespan territory, possibly).

should consult 12au7 data sheet and most of its variations for a distortion-vs chart to figure out ideal current per triode.
 
00 - v1_0 sch p3.png
page-3, cleaned up the front end circuit

00 - v1_0 sch p4.png
page-4, the sim schematic could be trimmed down to the bare minimum and delete some of the testing variances, like the switch in series with the output tube load equivalent resistor (and 1r, 10meg, 1gig).

the bias sim (previous posts) helps to estimate how much the outputs will load down the system. timer circuit was documented in an earlier post as well.
 
page-1 volts.png
page-1, converted the hand written notes to something easier to map out

a few voltages are of concern, version 1.1 will need to update a few things. should have used a smaller font...

the numbers are dc volts with reference to b-/ground after the pair of 100r.
 
TUBEMUEXKG1KG2KPKVBCCGCPGCCPRGI
6DJ8281.33303203002.3P2.1P0.7P2k
6L6CG8.71.3514604500481214P0.85P12P1k
12AX71001.410606003002.3P2.4P0.9P2k
12AU721.51.31180843002.3P2.2P1.0P2k
65507.91.358904800602414P0.85P12P1k
KT888.81.357304200 321614P0.85P12P1k

useful mu and kg1 numbers for falstad sim and its triode settings.
 
since there seems to be an issue uploading files/photos right now, confirmed with "the" moderator on duty, will need to do some typing.

looking at the voltage drop across v1.2 a couple posts ago, things seem unusually low (build manual indicated 180v) and in need of a rebalance. page-2 voltages are ready and waiting to be posted.
 
Screenshot 2026-08-29 at 23-55-09 7027a bias sim.png
doesnt match perfectly with the measurements but it should be close enough due to the imperfect resistances in the amp.
 
Back
Top Bottom