Well, I do think the younger generation being savvy shoppers themselves and knowing the prices of things would understand that you get what you pay for. I'm sure that the younger generation is not a completely cohesive unit in thought and opinion and that among their ranks are those who have other opinions of Crosleys that aren't so favorable. I'm really thinking that Crosleys are bought by parents for kids of the tween years. There are advantages to an underamped turntable for a kid who wants to listen to vinyl in your own house under your roof where you may not only have your own peace to think about, but your neighbors especially if you rent, you know. And replacement styli are cheap. And the units can take some abuse. And you never have to worry about cartridge alignment. And, and, and . . .
Yes, most kids listen to headphones so it's a nonissue. But there is a lot of research that says letting kids blast their ears with headphones and especially earbuds is bad in the short term and the long term.
It's not audiophile gear. It's mostly, I would say, purchased for kids between 9 and 14 years old. For marketing purposes, Crosley seems to know right where to aim this product. I don't think many of us here should really worry about record damage. I doubt I'm going to ever care about the quality of groove preservation of Justin Bieber's latest "vinyl."
I'd almost lament that I'd sold of that Crosley because I'd happy to give it to my daughter. But my wife would completely object only because, well, it was a gift from the ex, and also, it's beer **** brown--the original "retro" classroom record player color which was the original look Crosley went for. My wife is probably going to get one for my daughter and I'm sure that it's going to be in the pink/purple range with a white tonearm and be covered with stars and sparkles.
Getting on here and complaining about the quality of that unit is not unlike getting on a serious bike geek forum and complaining about Barbie bicycles, isn't it?