SaSi
Seriously Illogical
IIRC, the KA5500 delivers between 50 ~ 60WRMS. That amount of power is fine for the 104ab provided you don't want to go to the 105+dB range. If the enclosures are in perfect shape (no scratches, dents or discolorations) and the drivers are in top shape, then $300 seems like a fair price considering what you get. There appears to be a surge of 104s on ebay.uk and although prices are low nobody's buying.
I run a pair of those in a large living room with a 70W RMS amp. They sound great and effortless and I have never cranked the amp higher than 1 o'clock.
What cart do you have on the Rega P1? The 104ab are quite revealing in the mid-highs and unless the cart is a good performer you will be missing a lot - let alone listen for yourself the cart's shortcommings. But with a nice cart the system will sing.
A point about the original foam grilles. When the 104 came out grill transparency and possible ill effects were very closely studied. The 104s closely follow the doctrine that the grill should not have any solid material. Both for the fear of difraction and for avoiding resonances on the lightweight false baffle that isn't too rigidly mounted anyway.
Hence came the idea of the foam mounted on velcro stripes. Agreed, it doesn't look all that professional (a snob relative that show these commented upon the grill and suggested that my latest DIY speakers suffer in the finishing touches) but they do their function ok.
I do have to point out though that the doctrine these enclosures are supposed to follow would not endorse the 5 mm extension of the side panels to the front to form a casing for the foam. These extensions go against every known good practice on enclosure building.
So, if I was to go ahead and build new grilles, I would utilize this existing frame to have the grill snugly fit inside. A set of velcro stripes against the existing ones on the front baffle would ensure a tight fit as well.
And as for the differences between the SP1022 and SP1039 versions of the B200, they are so different they should not even be called similar names. The SP1039 has a larger voice coil, lighter diaphragm, half the Qm and a higher power handling among other differences. There has to be a different former in the SP1039 voice coil as well as it goes up an additional 70 degrees Celcius in normal service temperature compared to the SP1022.
I run a pair of those in a large living room with a 70W RMS amp. They sound great and effortless and I have never cranked the amp higher than 1 o'clock.
What cart do you have on the Rega P1? The 104ab are quite revealing in the mid-highs and unless the cart is a good performer you will be missing a lot - let alone listen for yourself the cart's shortcommings. But with a nice cart the system will sing.
A point about the original foam grilles. When the 104 came out grill transparency and possible ill effects were very closely studied. The 104s closely follow the doctrine that the grill should not have any solid material. Both for the fear of difraction and for avoiding resonances on the lightweight false baffle that isn't too rigidly mounted anyway.
Hence came the idea of the foam mounted on velcro stripes. Agreed, it doesn't look all that professional (a snob relative that show these commented upon the grill and suggested that my latest DIY speakers suffer in the finishing touches) but they do their function ok.
I do have to point out though that the doctrine these enclosures are supposed to follow would not endorse the 5 mm extension of the side panels to the front to form a casing for the foam. These extensions go against every known good practice on enclosure building.
So, if I was to go ahead and build new grilles, I would utilize this existing frame to have the grill snugly fit inside. A set of velcro stripes against the existing ones on the front baffle would ensure a tight fit as well.
And as for the differences between the SP1022 and SP1039 versions of the B200, they are so different they should not even be called similar names. The SP1039 has a larger voice coil, lighter diaphragm, half the Qm and a higher power handling among other differences. There has to be a different former in the SP1039 voice coil as well as it goes up an additional 70 degrees Celcius in normal service temperature compared to the SP1022.

.