• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Let's see your Fisher gear!

You hang on to that one! There are more and more people realizing the sound quality you can get from a 700T. It'll blow a 500TX right into the weeds.:yes:
 
You hang on to that one! There are more and more people realizing the sound quality you can get from a 700T. It'll blow a 500TX right into the weeds.:yes:

I had a 500TX too, never liked the look and the tuning. I gave it to my little sister. The 700T was my first piece of serious equipment-I traded in a Knightkit tube amp and a Bogen turntable for it and a Dual 1009F turntable. I will never let it go.
 
Guess I'm in the minority here. :D I've a 500TX, got from estate of original owner. Did a total Recap, some resistors, amp adjustments, and cleanup. Lettering is pretty worn on the face, but a ballpoint and a magnifier works for now, until I can find someone who does silkscreening that small. Pic on HTHMAN's thread on the 700.

It's like my SX-790. 45Watts that act like 60-70 or so. It's somewhat weak in the bass, BUT I guess Mr. Fisher voiced it more for Jazz, Classical and such rather than Rock. Bit brighter than my 400 but sounds very much like it.

What are the specs on the 700???

Larry
 
What are the specs on the 700???

From the '68 Fisher Handbook. 50WPC RMS at 0.8% harmonic distortion at 1KHz. 20-24000Hz power bandwidth, greater than 50 damping factor. 1.8 microvolt FM tuner sensitivity. Pretty good specs for an early SS receiver.

The newest units added to this thread are really nice. Steve's SA-300 was really sweet. :yes:
 
500TX came out in 69 to 71. Next series up I guess. Copying what my manual says for it. IHF Music Power @ 1kHz (8oHm) 190 Watts +- 1dB. RMS POWER (@1kHz) 65W/65W into 8oHms,0.5% h.d. Power Bandwidth IHF(8oHms) @ 1kHz: 8 to 35,000Hz, >30 damping factor, 1.7mV FM Usable Sensitivity. I think FISHER was OVERLY OPTIMISTIC with the specs.

The 500TX was TOTL for FISHER for those Two Years. I'll see if I can find the Hi Fidelity Mag Sept 69 article on it, where they test it and rescan it. I've got the test specs from the article below in the thumbnail.

100_1495.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 500tx 9-69 hi fidelity mag spec..jpg
    500tx 9-69 hi fidelity mag spec..jpg
    37.4 KB · Views: 26
Last edited:
As promised. Sept. 1969 Hi Fidelity Magazine review of the FISHER 500TX.

Red: If you want it for your archives I have it in .pdf that looks better.


Larry
 

Attachments

  • 500 tx review 1.jpg
    500 tx review 1.jpg
    109.9 KB · Views: 57
  • 500 tx review 2.jpg
    500 tx review 2.jpg
    99.2 KB · Views: 41
  • 500 tx review 3.jpg
    500 tx review 3.jpg
    80.1 KB · Views: 38
My Fisher Gear

Here's my Fisher pieces. Obviously I'm a bigger fan of the older Fisher components, I like the 50's era stuff the best. The 80T might not look like much but it's a great little FM tuner, I listen to it in my workshop all the time hooked to one of my 80AZ amps and an EV Aristocrat. Both the FM80 and the 101R need servicing and don't yet function. Both 80AZ's work well though. I just got the 50-C preamplifier which needs a power cord and possible some caps and selenium rectifier replaced. That's what the previous owner thought (regarding the selenium rect) anyway. It's also missing its tubes but I've got a pair of 12AX7's and a 12AT7 (Electro Harmonix) for when it's time to "fire" it up. No pun intended.
 

Attachments

  • Fisher_80-AZ_Pair_02.jpg
    Fisher_80-AZ_Pair_02.jpg
    127.9 KB · Views: 100
  • Fisher_101R_01.jpg
    Fisher_101R_01.jpg
    61.5 KB · Views: 247
  • Fisher_FM80_02.jpg
    Fisher_FM80_02.jpg
    52 KB · Views: 102
  • Fisher_80-T_01.jpg
    Fisher_80-T_01.jpg
    71.3 KB · Views: 107
  • Fisher_50-C_01.jpg
    Fisher_50-C_01.jpg
    30.4 KB · Views: 107
nelsress,

I love your older vintage stuff. I'm just starting to reach back that far. I've recently been lucky enough to get an early X-1000 integrated, but the faceplate is in awful condition.

What can you tell me about the 80-AZs?
I recently scored a pair of 100-AZs. They don't have the peak watts meter or the peak light, but are otherwise equivalent from my understanding. They were made the year I was born. I found schematics and manuals for the 80-AZs but not the 100s.
 
nelsress,

I love your older vintage stuff. I'm just starting to reach back that far. I've recently been lucky enough to get an early X-1000 integrated, but the faceplate is in awful condition.

What can you tell me about the 80-AZs?
I recently scored a pair of 100-AZs. They don't have the peak watts meter or the peak light, but are otherwise equivalent from my understanding. They were made the year I was born. I found schematics and manuals for the 80-AZs but not the 100s.

Don, you didn't find a 100 schematic? PM me your email address, I'll send it over to you.
 
Thanks Don. I also heard that the 100-AZs were virtual equivalent to the 80-AZs, less the meter/light but like you, I also only have the 80-AZ schematic so it's still only hearsay coming from me. I can tell you that they sound very good and other than bringing them up slowly with a variac the first time I haven't done anything to them. The one is completely original and the other had some caps replaced by the previous owner. I'm a child of the 50's myself (1954) and when I got my first Fisher pieces (the 80-T & 80-AZ) I was sold.
 
Wow, that FM-80 is gorgeous! Never seen one of those. I really like that wood case with the Fisher logo. Nice gear, thanks for posting! Seems like the early Fisher gear is pretty rare.
 
Thanks JT, my pleasure sharing with folks who appreciate the great old Fisher gear. I'd love to add a pic of a 55A sometime in the not-too-distant future to show y'all!! But, like I tell my wife, wish in one hand and s#!t in the other and tell me which one fills up first!! :)
 
Here's my Fisher pieces. Obviously I'm a bigger fan of the older Fisher components, I like the 50's era stuff the best. The 80T might not look like much but it's a great little FM tuner, I listen to it in my workshop all the time hooked to one of my 80AZ amps and an EV Aristocrat. Both the FM80 and the 101R need servicing and don't yet function. Both 80AZ's work well though. I just got the 50-C preamplifier which needs a power cord and possible some caps and selenium rectifier replaced. That's what the previous owner thought (regarding the selenium rect) anyway. It's also missing its tubes but I've got a pair of 12AX7's and a 12AT7 (Electro Harmonix) for when it's time to "fire" it up. No pun intended.

I'm jealous of that original Fisher cabinet.I'd love one for my X-101,and not a modern copy either!
 
You hang on to that one! There are more and more people realizing the sound quality you can get from a 700T. It'll blow a 500TX right into the weeds.:yes:

Any love for the 440T? Dug one out the Goodwill bins last month for $8.00,and I wonder if its worth getting worked on.It was definitely the oldest Fisher solid state gear I ever saw
 
Any love for the 440T? Dug one out the Goodwill bins last month for $8.00,and I wonder if its worth getting worked on.It was definitely the oldest Fisher solid state gear I ever saw

Roger. It was middle of the group for SS in 1967. decent performer. Pretty close to the 500C and 800C in specs. Do some basic clean up, DeOxit, and check it out. You might be surprised.

attachment.php



Larry
 

Attachments

  • 67-FISHER-RECEIVER chart.jpg
    67-FISHER-RECEIVER chart.jpg
    149.6 KB · Views: 337
Not sure whether Ive posted this here before, but here's my X-101-D on the bench for a checkup. I'm getting a difference in volume left to right...not sure what's up.
.
473bfc29-fb31-e0f7.jpg

.
...and it's faithful compadre, the FM-100-C, patiently awaiting a long overdue cleanup/adjustment.
.
473bfc29-fbe3-95ca.jpg
 
Nice Fisher stuff, check the volume pot may need cleaning I have a X101C replaced
the volume pot with a Alps much better, oh check resistors as well but the Fisher is
built so well and good cleaning is all it may need along with a changing of the
electrolytics.
 
Back
Top Bottom