Peter Breuninger
New Member
I don't disagree about "professional" CEOs, but entrepreneurs are to be applauded (most of the time).
Peter Breuninger, TAS
Peter Breuninger, TAS
Money that shows, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay past the point of diminishing returns.
Who in their right mind is going to actually ever use 20kw on a single pair of speakers?! Maybe for dynamic headroom, which some incredibly inefficient speakers or electrostats I could see 1kw/channel RMS capability. But wow, I sure wish people who had this amount of money would randomly give some of it to me. I have a long list of people that I'd rather give money to than spend $600k on an amplifier.
If they only made one Technics 1200 (for example) ever, it would cost a few million dollars given the R&D and tooling cost, etc. Just something to think about. Anything that is made, at least if it is made with many unique parts and not assembled from off the shelf hardware, with a production run in the single digits, is going to be costly. No economies of scale equals crazy prices. Not that that is what is going on with all of these amps...but it probably is the case with some of them.
They did not hand make the tubes, tubes sockets, any solid state devices, capacitors, resistors, wiring in ANY of those. Sheet metal work and custom round transformers do not $600,000 make.
They did not hand make the tubes, tubes sockets, any solid state devices, capacitors, resistors, wiring in ANY of those. Sheet metal work and custom round transformers do not $600,000 make.
Not if you add up the parts cost, even if the rest is custom made. But these aren't production pieces for the most part. They are in the same camp (as mentioned) of artwork, custom cars, hand made furniture, Swiss watches...things who's function can be matched by something cheaper, but that's not why you buy them. You buy them because of what they are more than what they do.
Well, perhaps you purchase them for what they are, I purchase them (or not) for what they do.
If you believe they are ART, then, as with all art, the beauty is in the eye of the beholder. What I behold is a very pretty piece of electronics that, in my opinion, is so overpriced as to be beyond ludicrous.
Shelly_D
And by the way, I have been to many a custom car and hot rod show and far more then half of those cars don't approach these levels of cost, even with the very expensive, hand work that custom paint jobs cost.
I'm attempting to explain why somebody else would buy it, not you or I. I think the prices are insane. I've met people who collect exotic cars, and once had drinks with a gentleman who could buy a small country if he wanted...there is a lot of money out there and because of that, there are a lot of ways to spend it. If oil on canvas can be priceless to somebody, I'm sure iron and wire on aluminum can be priceless to somebody else.
Well then, you are changing your argument. Earlier you compared these amps to a "one off" Technics 1200 TT. The parts that make up these amps are common. The R&D was done on them over 60 yrs ago. So your argument falls apart...
Why does everything have to be an argument? Can't somebody just try to fathom out-loud why something would cost so much or try to discuss it without it being some audio pissing contest? I really could care less if somebody chooses to drop half a million dollars on an amp that is for all intents and purposes a work of art, and a piece of machinery for which there are, in fact, no economies of scale. There may be nothing in them unique, or their could be, but the particular assembly of parts whether common or not, makes them unique as a whole.
All I'm trying to say is..for my argument to fall apart, it would have to be an argument. I'm just throwing out ideas here and having fun discussing some insanely expensive audio gear.
Ok, replace "argument" with "discussion". It still falls apart.![]()
Yes it is fun to discuss ideas, when you use some form of logic.