Thinking this is an f31? Not real familiar with rectifier tubes. Wondering if anyone can confirm this for me. Decent Mullard rectifier or just average? Thanks in advance!
f32 maybe?
I'm not sure, from what I can ascertain using this as an exampleSo the 136 and 1022 must be date/plant codes?

Thanks Dswankey. I can’t quite make out what comes after B. Prob doesn’t matter thoFrom what I know the f31 were the early version circa 1958-62, the f32 later
What comes after the B as seen in the pic?
I'm not sure, from what I can ascertain using this as an example
View attachment 3074721
The "B" stands for the Blackburn plant
The "7" stands for 1967
The "F" stands for June?
The "4" stands for 4th week of that month
Thanks Dswankey. I can’t quite make out what comes after B. Prob doesn’t matter tho
Which means that it wasn't worked very hard and probably is as good as new... literally. I have worked on many HH Scott tube amplifiers and have never found one that does not test new or almost new. Scott used them with 7591 amplifiers which as you know, required even more current. Don't discard it!!! For that matter, your Allied Radio Knight amplifier can be an excellent performer and probably has Mullard ECC83/12AX7 tubes as well?I don’t have a tester yet. But it came from a working knight amp with a quad of 7189 Mullards.
I don’t have a tester yet. But it came from a working knight amp with a quad of 7189 Mullards.
Which means that it wasn't worked very hard and probably is as good as new... literally. I have worked on many HH Scott tube amplifiers and have never found one that does not test new or almost new. Scott used them with 7591 amplifiers which as you know, required even more current. Don't discard it!!! For that matter, your Allied Radio Knight amplifier can be an excellent performer and probably has Mullard ECC83/12AX7 tubes as well?
KA-40?
I thought genuine vintage Mullard GZ34 tubes all had glass that was the same diameter as the base. The pictured tube has a smaller diameter glass envelope. Am I mistaken?
Gotta love old stock. Don’t make ‘em like that anymore.Which means that it wasn't worked very hard and probably is as good as new... literally. I have worked on many HH Scott tube amplifiers and have never found one that does not test new or almost new. Scott used them with 7591 amplifiers which as you know, required even more current. Don't discard it!!! For that matter, your Allied Radio Knight amplifier can be an excellent performer and probably has Mullard ECC83/12AX7 tubes as well?