• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

New to me 222 - the venerable triple deuce

By the way, isn't the method of setting the bias somewhat flawed/asymmetric? When you set the L bias it's with no current running through the R channel, but when setting the R channel the L channel is active. Thoughts?

Well I couldn't leave it like this without some more investigation, specially because the output transistors on the L channel were running 1-2 degrees cooler. Sure enough, measuring across either of the 0.5 emitter resistors, I got ~5mV on the R and only ~2.3mV on the L! Adjusted both sides to ~5.5mV when warm.


All of which is to say... If you used the service manual procedure, you'd better recheck your L channel bias!
 
Last edited:
#6

20260522_121922.jpg20260522_122112.jpg20260522_122450.jpg



Aaaand moment of truth:
20260522_122633.jpg

Yes! Unmolested! A few differences. D803/4 are populated. Emitter resistors are red. Outputs are 2SC646. No SV03s. Speaker terminals are screw type. These rectifiers didn't look factory though...

20260522_124636.jpg




Most important Q is: HOW DOES THIS THING SOUND SO GOOD?
 
Last edited:
It could've been #7 but for some reason you sold me one! :music:
Haha actually since I've been keeping track of all my purchases, yours counts as #3, even though I did nothing but clean it up and add speaker terminals. So I only have five of these. Will be restoring and selling a couple off, possibly after making cabinets for them.
 
Haha actually since I've been keeping track of all my purchases, yours counts as #3, even though I did nothing but clean it up and add speaker terminals. So I only have five of these. Will be restoring and selling a couple off, possibly after making cabinets for them.
Well, I love it the way it is and won't be touching it unless it becomes necessary. Eyes peeled for another one that I can work on, but you clearly have the inside track on the world's 222 supply chain! Can't wait to see your cabinets and mark me down for one if you start taking orders!
 
1780687320830.png




A/B'd #4 to a freshly restored 555 today. I expected it to be very close, or to not to be able to tell the difference at all. So I was surprised, but also a bit pleased, that the 222 comes out on top. For me, it wasn't subtle. The 555 is strongly reminiscent of the 777, with a very forward mids presence. The 222 is far sweeter, punchier and open. Having surveyed the first generation, minus the 101, I'd say the 222 is the middle of the spectrum between the 505 (no mids, sounded a bit dead) and the 555/777 (dynamic but a bit bright with too much presence). To me the 666 and the 888 sound flatter. The stock 999 is weak. The 555a is let down by a power amp section that does not do it justice - something I found out when I preamped it into a NAD 3140.

I'm left wondering whether the 101 can become the true BOTL king...
 

She’s a winner.
 

She’s a winner.
Hmmf I've already read that thread!
 
Picked up my first AU-222 today. Was a bit worried because the speaker terminals were hacked and replaced with DIN-connectors with lots of glue (!). Cleaning the mess turned out to be easier than I thought. Apart from the cover painted brown, the device appears to be unmolested, and working, for the most part. Yay!
 
Picked up my first AU-222 today. Was a bit worried because the speaker terminals were hacked and replaced with DIN-connectors with lots of glue (!). Cleaning the mess turned out to be easier than I thought. Apart from the cover painted brown, the device appears to be unmolested, and working, for the most part. Yay!
Pictures!
 
Back
Top Bottom