Since I don't own an FX I can't tell you the exact version. It's always best to buy parts like this from a major supplier like Digi-Key because counterfeits are common. Ask about the specific parts in the FX thread, some of them would know.
As I recall, some of the opamps they've been swapping can just be plugged in and others need to be soldered to an adaptor of some kind first. Doing so probably requires a microscope.
The first version of the FX had no opamps. I believe they may be part of the tone control circuit yet, apparently, they aren't actually needed since I've seen posts by people who say they simply removed them and they prefer the sound without them.
I know the FX is quite popular - especially with people who are new to tubes. But, IMO it seems a bit crazy how far people go, and how much people spend, on tube rolling, cap replacement, op-amp rolling, etc. when the biggest problem with the implementation of the FX is that it operates the tubes at very low voltages. And none of the mods have any effect on that.
My interest in the FX was piqued a while back, when I was breadboarding a preamp using a variety of tubes and the same simple (anode follower) circuit. I got curious and one FX owner was kind enough to measure the voltages so I could duplicate it on my breadboard. I tried the FX tube at stock voltages and then at more "normal" voltages suggested by the tube data sheet.
If you take the tube's triode plate curves (the FX uses a pentode wired as a triode) and draw a load line based on the stock operating point it's truly horrible. Yet, it sounds better than the curves would lead you to believe.
Not surprisingly though, it sounded
significantly better at normal voltages. I posted a couple of schematics of my "normal operating point" versions in the FX thread.
I never seriously considered using the FX tube because I knew it had much more gain than I needed. Most modern systems don't really need any gain at all, since power amps can normally be driven to full power by the output of a CD player or DAC alone. Some "tube flavor" is nice, though, and an active stage can often improve dynamics compared to a "passive preamp", aka a volume control.
The Reisong A10 is an integrated amp with its own preamp section already built in. But it's possible that its input section may have some issues. Inexpensive Chinese tube amps often seem to employ questionable design choices - see the recent thread and videos about modding a Nobsound 6P1 amp.
https://www.audiokarma.org/forums/index.php?threads/nobsound-6p1-amp-flaws-mods.939092/
So it's not too surprising that you prefer the sound of the A10 with the FX and since you have the version that has tone controls that should make it even more useful.
While many owners like the sound of the FX, the gain is probably the biggest problem. There are a lot of comments about how touchy the volume control is - the useful range is quite limited. So it's difficult to make minor level adjustments, it's often either too quiet or too loud. But, since the Reisong has its own volume control, you can just turn it down to the point where the control on the FX has more useful range.
I breadboarded several different tube types using the same circuit. The emphasis was more on the "tube flavor" aspect but I still wanted to have a bit of gain available if necessary.
Here's a link to what I built:
https://www.audiokarma.org/forums/index.php?threads/1626-preamp-build.931276/