• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

ortofon cartridge opinions please

I imagine the 200 NE might have a tight fit under the overhang of the OMP. A little sanding would be necessary. But the connection would work.
Thanks. Already pulled the trigger on the OMP before I saw your reply.
I won't mind sculpting the plastic a bit if required.
OMP + 200 NE = $47.40 shipped
 
Thank you Ortofon, modular rules. Only one cartridge is needed and the stylus source is cheap. I don’t need the $300 cartridges anymore.

No one asked but, ‘how in the devil does it get aligned?’ They planned for that too, remarkably easy.

My only problem is- how do I pronounce Ortofon?
 

Attachments

  • EPSN0640.JPG
    EPSN0640.JPG
    55.9 KB · Views: 158
  • EPSN0644.JPG
    EPSN0644.JPG
    59.7 KB · Views: 135
I take it since I have a Technics I can just set the overhang with my handy little $2 technics overhang gauge and call it a day.
 
that's what I understand. but you mite look at tracking force, alignment, arm height/balance before calling it quits.
 
Here's a thanks to Quest on the Digitrac stylus deal! Just got mine & popped it on my old OM body, nice right away! What do most of you guys track these at? I'm up at 1.75 grams for now, but I'll drop it a bit after it breaks in a while..
 
(...) My only problem is- how do I pronounce Ortofon?

*lol* Americans... :D Well, the interesting bits are the three Os in it, which are all pure Os (from a German perspective), just as in the English words "on", "off", "vomit", "bomb" et cetera - and the third one should be held a bit longer.

Greetings from Munich!

Manfred / lini
 
stereo_flowers.jpg


*lol* Welcome to floral decoration nightmare... :para:

...nice equipment though. :thmbsp:

Grinnings from Munich!

Manfred / lini

Almost like a funeral parlor. :thmbsp:
 
In response to Lini, I have two Technics DD tables SL Q2/D2. I'm using an OM 10. What is the right stylus to comply with these tonearms?
 
lplover: Yup, as Howard already wrote, for those 12 g arms the 5E would be the more ideal match - but especially if you use your OM10 without the weight plate, that isn't a bad match either.

Greetings from Munich!

Manfred / lini
 
The Ortofon OM5E is a lower end cart, while the AT110 is better and the V15III is a much better cart, at least in specs.

However, I have recently discovered the Ortofon carts and I can say I am impressed with the clarity they can deliver compared to Stanton (681EEES) and Shure (M95ED) carts I've used before.

The Shure V15 cart might be a bit too much (in terms of compliance) for the 1350's tonearm.

My ProJect TT came with the OM5E mounted and I wasn't thrilled with it, but I liked it somewhat. I recently replaced it with a 681EEE Mark III. Although it wasn't a huge improvement the Stanton was the clear winner.
 
I use the cartridge with the brass weight in it. Is this better on the Technics arms?
The brass weight in the mount of the OM series carts is designed to be removable so you can better match the mass of the cart + arm to the cantilever compliance. Check to see what the published effective mass of your arm is and determine whether it's worthwhile to remove the weight.
 
I use the cartridge with the brass weight in it. Is this better on the Technics arms?

As already mentioned above, it would be theoretically more ideal to use the OM10 without the weight plate on your 12 g arms. With the weight plate installed, the resonance should be a tad on the low side, but not critically low - i.e., unless you'd in practice experience problems like woofer pumping especially with somewhat warped records, I don't really see a need to change anything....

Greetings from Munich!

Manfred / lini
 
I'm using the OM 10 on a Pioneer PL 10 table (similar to a PL 12D) WITH the brass weight. I tried it without the weight, but it was just too light. However, do you think the arm on the Technics is different from the Pioneer? Should I remove the weight?
 
lplover: Oops - I just realize that I completely forgot about the potential balancing issue. Gotta check that... *insert your elevator music of choice here*

*bing* ... oh, yes: According to the manuals, the applicable cartridge weight range for both Technics models starts at 6 g (unless one would use an extra weight on the headshell). So using the OM10 without the weight plate would only theoretically be more ideal in terms of resonance - in practice one probably wouldn't get the arms balanced.

Greetings from Munich!

Manfred / lini

P.S.: Can't comment on your PL-10, as I've got next to no experience with Pioneer tables...
 
Back
Top Bottom