If you stuck a spacer under the record you also changed the VTA of the stylus, keep that in mind too.
Quite aware, I stated in my posting that due to the designed-in dishing of the H-K mat the spacer essentially doesn't alter average outer-area VTA on that TT. A couple mms off the mat shouldn't be too significant in any case but YMMV. Also do understand a weight or clamp is essential with this approach.
I didn't think much of the platterless either and never did, being a platter mat hardcore sort. However the proof is in the result and there is something very intriguing going on here re a marked 'openness', enhanced clarity, and HF extension with detailing and focus notably enhanced. Live and learn.
Quite aware, I stated in my posting that due to the designed-in dishing of the H-K mat the spacer essentially doesn't alter average outer-area VTA on that TT. A couple mms off the mat shouldn't be too significant in any case but YMMV. Also do understand a weight or clamp is essential with this approach.
well if there is zero risk for my old Thorens 150.. I am going to spend the 5.99 on a hockey puck and give it a try... Will make the hole just a bit smaller than the spindle....
I am not comfortable with adding weight.... great thread BYW!
Agreed re. the platter-less turntable. If there was any substance to Meitner's claims, the design would have lived on and all other turntable manufacturers would have followed suit.....NONE DID.
So much for that.
The stock H/K mat is dished? Why? All models? (Not that I'm using their mat any more).
Agreed re. the platter-less turntable. If there was any substance to Meitner's claims, the design would have lived on and all other turntable manufacturers would have followed suit.....NONE DID.
So much for that.
I always thought the notion was utter nonsense along with felt mats and the like but as I said, live and learn. It has altered my long-held notions of what constitutes basic competent playback physics. I suspect the concept was just too radical to be taken seriously without ears-on auditioning and few had enuff interest or curiosity to be bothered aside from this having been the dawn of shifting interest toward CD digital playback and the twilight of LP playback.
Our hobby has rarely strayed from proven formula's for making money. And that means traditional thinking! The high end takes what the mainstream will tolerate and improves it. This often results in very tradional thinking even amoung audiophiles.
Here is a couple of examples of genius that never flew on a large scale! Does that mean the ideas or sound quality was not up to standards because everyone else never ran with it?
Mike Wright of Dayton- Wright used SFL gas in bags inside his speakers.
Alan Shaw uses thin walled cabs for his Harbeth speakers.
Ed Meitner used a Floating Charge power supply for 35 amp peaks in my amps.
Peter McAlister uses 12DG6 Horiztontal sweep tubes and makes amps that stun everyone.
PMC uses 75mm dome midrange drivers unlike everyone else.
Phil Clements used 7" planer magnetic drivers for tweeters. He was the only one I know and the 4 I have are better to my ears than any dome I have heard.
Steve Nugent proved why 1m was the absolute worst length for a 75ohm cable. But guess what everyone uses.
FTR Ed Meitner also made a TT that used a stream of water and sonar to read the grooves!
OK....as pointless as this is, my focus was ONLY on the Meitner table and the fact that it no longer exists. Well-intentioned though it might have been, again......it never caught on and.....it no longer exists.
OK....as pointless as this is, my focus was ONLY on the Meitner table and the fact that it no longer exists. Well-intentioned though it might have been, again......it never caught on and.....it no longer exists.
"the design would have lived on and all other turntable manufacturers would have followed suit.....NONE DID."
Meitner was making the rounds with his AT-1 at a time when audiophiles were doing their level best to rid the world of vinyl playback. Ed moved ahead with digital and we all know what that resulted in (if you ever heard his Bidat you know what I mean)
The first article I read was actually an interview with Andrew Marshall of Audio Ideas Guide. And Ed recommended that people who wanted to try it simply take off their mat, cut out the label of an old record and place their albums on the label. This raised it enough to hear the improvement. Andrew did it with his Heybrook TT2 and left it that way for years if memeory serves.
I started there and have always embraced the idea in one form or another in several TT's. The idea for the most part has been rejected by most but rarely from people that actually try it. I have done several head to heads with a variety of tables I have owned and feel that Ed's main points were valid.
marc mc