... I'll have to look at the PCB switch versions but the standalone switches have holes for pins that act as stops.
Greyhill makes all their switches in adjustable-stop versions, it's a matter of finding them in-stock. Mouser doesn't have the 71 series in-stock. Someone else may.
Were you able to fit in 1/4 watt resistors or are those 1/8 watt?
1/4w, same as used on main board.
What caps did you assume?
Footprint for 5mm pitch pins. Max size 7.5mm long x 2.5mm wide, PP film or MLCC ceramic. Caps larger than that would require a proportional increase in board size.
Last question: How are the positions paired? For example, 1 and 13, 2 and 14, etc.
Yes. Pin-for-pin correspondence to switch pins.
On further pondering, there may be a bit of concern. With mounting holes at rear corners, this board will be fully cantilevered out. I have no idea how heavy the board will be with both switches & all the parts, so it may need some kind of vertical support at the front corners. Rigid drive shafts to front panel may or may not suffice. Keep that in mind for the rest of this post.
Q: do you want the interconnect wires on a socket/header as depicted it the previous example? or directly aligned with the main board load resistor pads as shown in this example?
There are other ways to do the layout as well.
This one moves the mounting holes forward, alleviating cantilever concerns, but the board is no longer flush to the end of the main board, extends backwards a bit, and it's not possible to align the wire pads with the main board.
And this one reduces board size as much as possible. Cantilever not AS much, but still more than the above. The circles on either side of J1/J2 indicate where direct alignment to main board pads would be.
Having said all that, IMHO, surface mount parts provide the ideal solution. Produces the smallest board, cleanest, shortest copper tracks, with multiple mounting hole options.
Here's the "X-ray" views showing copper traces. Thru-hole far more complex than SMD (1206 size SMT shown)..
Thru-hole:
SMD:
