Nicely done, a lot of work!
For example:
I would call first generation SS:
AU-777
AU-222
AU-555
AU-999
Second generation:
AU-666
AU-888
The following models are like a mix between first and second ( to be honest this is also applying to the AU-999) Cap coupled and quasi complementary outputs with the cosmetic design of the DC coupled circuit.
( For the AU-999 the opposite except the quasi complementary outputs).
AU-555A
AU-505
AU-101
But, I can live with calling all these models first generation. I would prefer to have a difference between quasi/ full complementary.
After this come the AU-x500 models
As far as I know this was a small line up.
AU-6500
AU-7500
AU-8500
AU-9500
There circuit design develops through the AU-5500/7700 and AU-2900/7900.
Here the cosmetic design is going back to the AU-777 with a twist.
Is this second generation?
The cosmetic design changes with the AU-5500-7700 through the AU-2900-7900, circuit is basically the same.
For me this is at least third generation.
Then it gets easy to the next generation ( fourth?), AU-607/707, different cosmetic design, layout and circuit.
For me the AU-D607/707/907/X1/907LIMITED belong to the same generation, but not to the AU-607/707, so fifth generation.
Why? In the AU-607/707 only dual-jfet differential in the output stage, no diamond differential, no high speed circuit and transistors in the Darlington stage.
I am curious what other people think of this generation division!