Phil, you call me jaded, and say you have squandered all the 'valuable information' I provided. My sole contribution to this thread is quoted, below:
luvvinvinyl said:
Given that the Wharfedales sold, albeit off-ebay, have you followed through with
this commitment, as posted in
this thread?
TA, Phil hasn't changed his colours, from first post till now. He's enduring more scrutiny, now, with these results.
My question remains unanswered.
My observation, to TA, notes that you have been true to your own code, and have recently become more widely noticed. You ARE the same person who showed up here, some 8+ weeks ago, the very model of consistency. I base this on having read
all the threads in which you have posted. I am not criticizing you for your character, merely making an observation. As I am sure you know, not everyone fits into every circle of people, whether in the virtual world, or the real one. You have stepped into a higher-profile, of late, with your posts, and are being noticed by more members. Just as you are free to conduct yourself according to your own personal code, others are free to have their opinion of you. You don't have to agree with those opinions, you don't have to dispute those opinions, you don't even have to care about those opinions. You must recognize, however, that those opinions of your personal code are as valid, to others, as your personal code is to you. I would expect that you aren't going to change, based on those opinions, and would be surprised if you were to do so. You don't have to acknowledge these opinions, either. You can simply put those who hold opinions, with which you do not agree, on your 'Ignore List'. Threads/posts/pm's by those persons will disappear into cyberspace, as if they did not share your virtual world. By the same token, that list works in both directions.