If someone buys it, then it must have been worth that much. If no one does, it wasn't.
Simple as that.
If somebody REALLY wants one.
I do, however, think that listing a modified item as 'NEW' takes a few liberties with the definition of 'NEW'.
Just checked out his other items for sale. $487 for an unopened King Crimson LP, $687 for Tea For The Tillerman? :jawdrop:
I dunno. I'm all for free enterprise and all, but this is just nuts.
It's still free enterprise. He's free to ask what he wants. He probably won't get it. But that's how it works; or doesn't, as the case may be.
Jeez well I have a yamaha cassette deck, i'll post it for $2000 since it's a little dusty, free enterprise and totally unrealistic are two big differences.
You're right there, but the question that comes to mind is: Is this not borderline unethical? I can imagine someone paying these prices under the mistaken impression that the asking price reflects the rarity and or quality of the item. I also realize that caveat emptor applies as much here as anywhere else, but none the less. I can't help but feel that this is not quite cricket if you will pardon the expression.