I have used both turpintine/blo and mineral siprits/blo. There is no visible difference between the two once finished, I prefer MS because the odor is much more bearable. I could apply it in my living room if I wanted.Hello All...
I'm just completing a speaker restoration (4333a) and I'm attempting to recreate the JBL recommended finish. The BLO/Turp mixture isn't possible because I live in the Republic of California and turp isn't sold here due to the VOCs. I'd love to hear what people's experiences are with:
Thanks in advance.
- turp alternatives? (mineral spirits?), or
- no turp at all (just BLO)?
I too have 166's. Your cabinets look beautiful, what do you use on them? Mine, like your's are near mint. I use a yearly application of Restore-a-Finish and Feed & wax.I have a pair of L-166, about the same vintage as your monitors. The walnut veneer appears to be the same color & tint.
View attachment 1722258 View attachment 1722260
Well... it looks like mineral spirits are also banned. It appears that the products that create the thinner / deeper penetrating element of the JBL formula (turp or mineral spirits) both off gas so much that those of us in CA (SoCal) are out of luck.
Just want to say it looks like he's removing a decent bit of material with those glass scrapers. Almost more like fine planing the wood than just cleaning it.Just a step sideways here , if your cabinets have a significant build up of all the usual gunk , consider 'scraping' the cabinets.
Get some picture glass and smash it. Pick a piece with a gentle convex curve and use that as a scaper.
Its a very traditional method , very controlable and leaves the woof with a lovely silk sheen that just pops through your Danish , Beeswax or whatever.
It's fast too !!
You can see even after a few passes in the second vid the wood surface starts to have more 3D look about it.. That's called 'Chatoyance' lterally meaning cats eye.
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Chatoyance&FORM=HDRSC2
Antique Mahogany will often still display that holographic effect simply because the oldies used broken glass for scraping.
Once you get the hang of it there is no subsequent sanding required , the dust just makes the cut wood surface dull by clogging the capilliaries.
Try it on some old but good quality scrap , you will never look back.
M
I would like to know what you are basing this claim on, because based on the historical documentation I have seen most American made speaker cabinets from the '50s-'70s left the factory with an oiled finish, JBL and Altec most certainly. To quote JBL's original cabinet maintenance guide that I previously linked on this thread, "Most JBL enclosures are sanded and rubbed until they are mirror smooth, then hand finished with oil".No speaker cabinets from that era were ever varnished or oiled. They used a wax on them.
I know what it says, but you can't get the products they used anymore than you can get the type of lacquer that Fender and Gibson used on their guitars which gave them the sound that is so cherished and highly prized. A closer approximate to the finish that they came with is a good paste wax. It takes much longer to apply and has to be worked into the wood, but it does a better job in the long run.