Shure M110HE (nude hyperelliptical stylus)
Empire 480LT (nude 0.2 x 0.7 elliptical)
ADC PSX-40 (nude 0.2 x 0.7 elliptical--I purchased an NOS stylus for this one)
That is a very nice selection of p-mounts you have there.
Shure M110HE (nude hyperelliptical stylus)
Empire 480LT (nude 0.2 x 0.7 elliptical)
ADC PSX-40 (nude 0.2 x 0.7 elliptical--I purchased an NOS stylus for this one)
Interesting - now that I’m home looking at the table, I see that the M75p has a different shaped stylus holder than a typical M75. It has the full plastic front like an M92.
Any ideas for stylus compatibility here?
EDIT - after further inspection, it is an Encore Me75p cartridge. Can find options for this.

That is a very nice selection of p-mounts you have there.
The ME75P takes the (p-mount*) N92E stylus (source: Shure Stylus Replacement Guide 1988 https://www.vinylengine.com/library/shure/stylus-replacement-guide.shtml ), and the upgrade N99E, N104E or N105E styli (getting better as you go higher in number). Some of those should still be available.
* There was, of course, a half-inch mount M92E in the late-1960's, which was quite different and shares the body of the M91 and M93-series, as well as taking their styli, but it’s quite different to the later M92E – Shure messed up the p-mount M92E cartridge numbering.![]()
AT450 is in every way superior to AT92ECD, AT3482P, Shure M92E, etc.How does this AT450 compare to AT-92ECD?
As of Friday I joined this club. I bought a used Sony PS-LX510 that came with its stock cartridge. Today a Grado Black 1 should be arriving (though it may be delayed a day).
AT450 is in every way superior to AT92ECD, AT3482P, Shure M92E, etc.
I purchased one from that eBay seller and cantilever is slightly corroded, looks like some tiny spikes grown on the surface. It sounds excellent.
Also I purchased ATU4040EP and the one I have doesn't sound excellent. Actually it sounds bad. Probably hardened rubber.
Another one is SS445E/U this one is my favorite, I have seven of them now but so far I listened to only one. One out of seven has a substantially bent cantilever, two with minor bents and four look perfect.
The sound is very satisfying. I used to swap AT92ECD, AT3482P and M92E from time to time because they sound very different and each can offer it's own perspective. Now they have nothing to offer.
AT450 is in every way superior to AT92ECD, AT3482P, Shure M92E, etc.
I purchased one from that eBay seller and cantilever is slightly corroded, looks like some tiny spikes grown on the surface. It sounds excellent.
Also I purchased ATU4040EP and the one I have doesn't sound excellent. Actually it sounds bad. Probably hardened rubber.
Another one is SS445E/U this one is my favorite, I have seven of them now but so far I listened to only one. One out of seven has a substantially bent cantilever, two with minor bents and four look perfect.
The sound is very satisfying. I used to swap AT92ECD, AT3482P and M92E from time to time because they sound very different and each can offer it's own perspective. Now they have nothing to offer.
The ME75P takes the (p-mount*) N92E stylus (source: Shure Stylus Replacement Guide 1988 https://www.vinylengine.com/library/shure/stylus-replacement-guide.shtml ), and the upgrade N99E, N104E or N105E styli (getting better as you go higher in number). Some of those should still be available.
* There was, of course, a half-inch mount M92E in the late-1960's, which was quite different and shares the body of the M91 and M93-series, as well as taking their styli, but it’s quite different to the later M92E – Shure messed up the p-mount M92E cartridge numbering.![]()
Well, I have noticed a number of people on the old interwebs suggesting that an N97xe can be used in an M92e for an instant upgrade
I just tried it and it does fit, though I can see manufacturing tolerances allowing some to fit and others to fit almost-but-not-quite. The plastic cap on the M92E can be popped off easily with fingers if it happens to get in the way. The brush can stay too, but should be used in the playing position unless the turntable allows tracking-force adjustment.I can try this out when I get home. I believe I have tried it before though and it did not fit. You would want to remove the stabilizer brush. The Shure N 104e will fit for sure and is the same .2x.7 elliptical.
Close! Going by the published specs, the RXT6 stylus (R16X) was an N111E that tracked a quarter-gram heavier for the same tracking ability. Sort of an N111EJ.IIRC the M111HE was also the same as the Realistic RXT6.
Yep, the RXT5 is an upgraded M105E with a stabilizer brush instead of a "destaticizer" brush with no damping.I have the model one notch lower, the RXT5, also a rebadged Shure p-mount with a brush, equivalent to an M105E (again, if I recall correctly).
Close! Going by the published specs, the RXT6 was an N111E that tracked a quarter-gram heavier for the same tracking ability. Sort of an N111EJ.
Yep, the RXT5 is an upgraded M105E with a stabilizer brush instead of a "destaticizer" brush with no damping.
Handy for us, all the non-V15 Shure p-mounts used the same body with only a very few exceptions, and minor exceptions at that.
Do you have any info on the Grace F8- and F-9 stylus - specification.
I only have the Stereo Review Buyer's Guide for 1984 to go by.
Yes, although I don't think they made any p-mounts. However, here's what I know.
Grace called their 0.2 x 0.8mil elliptical stylus, as used on the F9L (and other models), a special ‘Luminal Trace’ or ‘Advanced Luminal Trace’ shape. I believe ‘Luminal Trace’ refers to the fact that it’s a thin (0.2mil) elliptical, that traces records well, while the Advanced Luminal Trace (ALT) refers to ones which track at a lighter tracking force. It’s just a standard elliptical tip shape.
F8-Series – Production ended in the 1980’s, and stylus production in the 1990’s.
F-8D (green colour stylus) 0.7mil conical, 2-5g tracking force, for radio stations etc.
F-8H (red) 0.5mil conical stylus, 1-3g, (2g recommended)
F-8L (transparent), 0.2 x 0.8mil elliptical, 0.5-2.5g tracking force (1.5g recommended)
F-8L’10 (transparent/clear), 0.2 x 0.8mil elliptical stylus (ALT), 0.5-2.5g (1.5g), 10th anniversary model
F-8C (transparent), elliptical stylus, 0.5-1.5g (1.2g), ‘Classic’ model
F-8M (brown) 0.2 x 0.8mil elliptical, 0.5-2.5g (1.8g)
F-8E (yellow/green) 0.2 x 0.8mil elliptical, 0.5-2.5g (1.5g), ultra light aluminium alloy cantilever
F-8F (blue) Shibata stylus, 1.0-2.5g (1.5g), ultra light alloy aluminium cantilever
F-8V (grey) 0.2 x 0.8mil elliptical stylus (ALT), 1-2g, ultra light tapered aluminium alloy cantilever, last model F8 cartridge produced in 1980’s
F9-series
F-9P = 16.5μm/0.65mil conical, 1-4g tracking force (2.5g recommended) - for professional use – radio stations etc
F-9D = 0.65mil conical, 0.5-2g (1.2g)
F-9L = 0.2 x 0.8mil elliptical, 0.5-2g (1.2g)
F-9U = line contact, 0.5-2g (1.2g)
F-9E = 0.2 x 0.8mil elliptical, 0.5-2g (1.2g)
F-9F = line contact (described by Grace as ‘Shibata-type’), 0.5-2g (1.2g)
F-9R = 0.2 x 0.8mil elliptical, 0.5-2g (1.2g), ruby cantilever
Level II (styli compatible with F8-series)
The Level II was the best cartridge Grace ever made, and was introduced in the mid-80's. Used either Oxygen Free Copper (OFC) wire or Linear Crystal OFC wire (a type of wire from Hitachi, where the copper ‘crystals’ are re-arranged to supposedly improve characteristics – but a cynic like me would say mainly improves Hitachi’s profits from selling very over-priced wire to gullible audiophiles with too much money!). According to Grace, the coil winding machine was reduced in speed for the LC-OFC wire, so as not to disturb the linear crystals! The Level II was apparently an upgraded version of the F8 body, but with improvements such as the interior of the bodies being filled with resin to limit coil mechanical resonance, and the styli are compatible, so Level II styli can be used as an upgrade on F8 cartridges.
Various Level II cantilevers were offered, including (stylus housing colour in brackets):
AL: Aluminium (blue)
RB: Ruby (red)
BE: Beryllium (brown)
BR: Boron (orange)
SA: Sapphire (clear)
RC: Rare Ceramic (green)
Some had nude 0.2 x 0.8mil elliptical tips (I’ve seen one of those on both beryllium and rare ceramic cantilevers for sale), some had (allegedly, according to a member on another audio forum) nude hyperelliptical line contact tips, and the best models all had Namiki Jewel’s superb Micro-Ridge styli, signified by the letters MR following the cantilever material – for instance, BR/MR (Boron Micro-Ridge) or RC/MR (Rare Ceramic Micro-Ridge).
There was also a professional model, the Level II Disco, with a strengthened cantilever (probably of aluminium alloy) for DJ’s, about which I can’t find any info, but I assume they had a higher tracking force.
Most Level II hi-fi models tracked at 1-2g.
F14-series (styli compatible with F9-series)
The F-14 replaced the F9-series, and had similar technology improvements to the Level II. The F-14 styli were compatible with the F-9 cartridges, and had similar features to the Level II styli, so you could upgrade an F-9R ruby cantilever stylus (for instance) with an F-14 BR/MR stylus (Micro-Ridge tip on tapered BoRon cantilever) to get superior performance.
In 2009, Grace apparently made a last production run of styli, for their 60th anniversary, but I believe they’d already sold out in 2008, before they’d even been made. Although Shinagawa Musen still exist and have an office, they no longer manufacture audio-related equipment (allegedly).

I recently bought a Sony XL-250G cartridge; is it the stock cartridge that came with your turntable? JICO has an elliptical stylus upgrade available on their site.