Attachments
Last edited:
here is my challenge...use the tools availble in 1972 and design a better sounding affordable bookshelf speaker...:yes:
We have an investigative process here, but they will accept the 6" square waveguides, which easily surpass the original high frequency design performance objectives, yes.Nice dust caps. Baby Ewave or ?
Stereophile converted the selling price to $668/pair in 2006 dollars. I'm guessing more like $750 today, which translates to rather high-end on the scale of affordability. Considering the acquisition cost, there is a generous margin for update/upgrade, even at the original early 1970s $139.90/pair price point.Here is MY challenge...Use the tools availble in 1972 and design a better sounding affordable bookshelf speaker... :yes:
Here is MY challenge...Use the tools availble in 1972 and design a better sounding affordable bookshelf speaker...:yes:
We have an investigative process here, but they will accept the 6" square waveguides, which easily surpass the original design performance objectives, yes.
Stereophile converted the selling price to $688/pair in 2006 dollars. I'm guessing more like $750 today, which translates to rather high-end on the scale of affordability. Considering the acquisition cost, there is considerable margin for update/upgrade, even at the original early 1970's price point.
It's a bit early to tell, but Mr. Kloss himself would appear to have done somewhat better for 1/5 the cost using modern knowledge, materials, and design techniques.... :yes:If you're gonna beat Mr. Kloss at his own game, you have to play the same game with the same means....
It's a bit early to tell, but Mr. Kloss himself would appear to have done somewhat better for 1/5 the cost using modern knowledge, materials, and design techniques.... :yes:
Refoan them and recap and give them a try. I like them better than the original Advent Loudspeaker as the drivers are closer and there is less dip in the crossover region.
I not interested in bringing them back it would be better to resell them as there are many who would appreciate them.

I DO hear it, of course, but I also hear this:You don't know Zilch like I know Zilch.......that request just fell on selectively deaf ears. :thmbsp:
John Atkinson in Stereophile said:Some aspects of the Smaller Advent's measured performance were positive. For example, it reminded me of the benefits for bass performance of a well-tuned sealed box, compared with the reflex designs that are now ubiquitous. But despite its relatively even balance through the midrange and low treble, the Advent's tweeter is a total underperformer compared with modern designs, and its cabinet is way too resonant.
Zilch, you are like E.F. Hutton to me.......![]()
You've seen the ZilchMobile, apparently....More like, and I say this with all due respect, and admiration, Columbo! :thmbsp:![]()