I know where you're coming from John, and if he had committed a crime with a penalty greater than a moving violation fine, I'd agree. But as long as his personal domestic issues do not constitute a crime, they are not the public's business.
Personally I don't make a habit of putting human beings up on pedestals. In my experience that's a recipe for disappointment. For all his athletic prowess, he's just a man, pretty much the same as any other. If this wasn't Tiger Woods, it wouldn't be news at all, and there's the dividing line for me. It is unfair for the media to insert themselves into anyone's life the way they have here, for no more cause than they have in this case. If this had happened to anyone, I would be saying the same thing. He has just as much (and no more) right to privacy as any other citizen.
I guess what I'm trying to say is, that just because he makes his living in the public eye, he shouldn't have to forfeit the rights of privacy that all of us should share in.