• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Wolfson vs Beats, sad story.

Pio1980

AK Member
See Forbes on-line,
"How Things Went Wrong For The Company That Could Have Beaten Beats".
Byline; Sharif Sakr

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
 
Register to hide this ad
Wolfson's annual report shows annual revenue of $179 million. Beats close to $1.5 billion. How is that sad?
 
Wolfson designs high performance audio components, Beats markets style.
I'd much prefer high quality sound to being in style for a while.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
There are many great choices for folks that want substance over style in the headphone market. Beats just happens to know where the real money is.

:tongue:
 
Am I correct in assuming that Wolfson makes products that are very cheap on their own however they sell millions and millions of them? Am I correct in assuming that Wolfson is more of an OEM if anything?

I just don't see a logical comparison between an OEM and a lifestyle brand.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 
I had an HTC phone with Beats bass boost comp and didn't like it at all, would have much preferred a properly engineered audio system like Wolfson.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
 
I had an HTC phone with Beats bass boost comp and didn't like it at all, would have much preferred a properly engineered audio system like Wolfson.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Wolfson makes the physical chips.

Beats Audio in phones and laptops is nothing more than a software equalizer that you can never truly disable. Still a difference. Software vs. hardware.

A lot of iPods and iPhones are known to have Wolfson chips in them....
 
Wolfson's annual report shows annual revenue of $179 million. Beats close to $1.5 billion. How is that sad?
Yeah, the article seems to be making a strange comparison. A few reason Apple bought Beats were not mentioned...Jimmy Iovine, music streaming service, and revenues. Wolfson has nothing comparable in those areas.
 
Right, afaik the streaming service was the main attraction. Beats may evolve into quality sound eventually with the broader market.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
 
I think the manufacturing infrastructure for smart headphones was the real goal. This rumor is already bearing fruit with the release by Philips of the first Lightening cable powered headphones earlier this week....
 
Some months ago while in a store I happened on a Beats headphone display and reading so much about them thought I would give a listen. Can not remember the models nor do I want to. IF the ones I tried are considered good by today's market, I am happy to be much older. Most of the displayed models were in the $175 and up range to my hearing reminded me of the early digital era with some of the wacky things that came out to promote and prove how good a CD is.
 
What is funny to me is how many of these Beats headphones you see for sale on Craigslist. Makes me wonder are they really worth the hype, or are people sucked into buying something they can not really afford for the sake of fashion? :scratch2:
 
What is funny to me is how many of these Beats headphones you see for sale on Craigslist. Makes me wonder are they really worth the hype, or are people sucked into buying something they can not really afford for the sake of fashion? :scratch2:
I have read that there are TONS of knock-off Beats headphones, so people on Craigslist could simply be unloading those.
 
On the bright side, I've tried Beats (No doubt demo'd with some EQ-modified audio stream), and I just don't like them or the way they feel. Not even that fond of the way they look (Now, ... Soul by Ludacris, that's another story... Break me off a chunk).

I lke my RSII's (RSIIi, actually), but even they're not perfect. I get the feeling I should have gone with RSI's instead, as I think they may have a fatter bass (which I like), although I find that the earpads from my SR80's solve much of that problem in the RSII's. But I'd sure love to try the RSI's with the SR80 pads. I think that could be perfect for me, or close at least.

But as far as crappy, mass-fi-marketed designer headphones go, there's just no real accounting for taste OR sound-quality.
 
I have read that there are TONS of knock-off Beats headphones, so people on Craigslist could simply be unloading those.

KNOCK-OFF Beats?

What's next? Bootleg McDonald's?

Getcher bootleg COBY walkman-types rightcheer...... Some hot, smokin' deals to be had rightcheer, y'all...

"Please don't bump the cardtable, Ma'am."
 
Last edited:
The Beat buds ($150 msrp) that came with my HTC Resound went unused. The Klipsch Image S4 are so much better.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
 
KNOCK-OFF Beats?

What's next? Bootleg McDonald's?

Getcher bootleg COBY walkman-types rightcheer...... Some hot, smokin' deals to be had rightcheer, y'all...



"Please don't bump the cardtable, Ma'am."

I have a small collection and use fountain pens, especially fond of Parker. There is a Chinese company that makes cheap knockoffs of the 51. Look similar but distinctively different. They can be had for sound $3. Not long ago, there appeared knockoffs of the knockoffs that look almost exactly like the knockoff. These sell in the range of $1. Seems nothing is sacred.
 
KNOCK-OFF Beats?

What's next? Bootleg McDonald's?

Getcher bootleg COBY walkman-types rightcheer...... Some hot, smokin' deals to be had rightcheer, y'all...

"Please don't bump the cardtable, Ma'am."

Seriously?

You are expressing incredulity at the notion of people making knockoffs of one of the most desired items on the market, esp one that are primarily marketed towards kids that don't know any better?

???

I'd think that Beats would be one of the very most likely to have knockoffs made in their likeness.
 
Back
Top Bottom