Decibel_116
AK Subscriber
I am not certain how much signal breaks like tone controls affect the sound in the real world (my balance control knob, however, is problematic enough I wish it wasn't there), but radio and recording studios have historically followed thorough maintenance schedules, like changing tubes in short periods of time (back when they were CHEAP), opening up consoles and cleaning all pots and switches, etc. Not to mention it is almost always very well made gear to begin with. I mean, the Beatles engineers would create devices like analog time shifting modules on demand! These people were not only technically adept, but creative geniuses!
Sorry, I remain quite unconvinced. ..Only in audio play-back will you find people who obsess over minimizing signal breaks. If a tone control, WHEN ZERO'd, is audibly damaging the signal, then it's a poorly implemented tone control. Thankfully, in most cases integrated amps with Tone Controls have a tone defeat switch to take it out of the circuit. Now are you suggesting that the few signal breaks necessitated by the Tone defeat are ALSO audibly damaging the signal?? ..Sorry, I don't believe it.
Can you hear signal breaks in your speaker cables? ..To anyone reading this, I'd suggest this following experiment. ..Get 20 ft. of lamp cord to use as temporary speaker cable (don't worry, you can go back to your pricey fancy cable later), hook up one speaker with a clean 10ft. length, then the other I suggest you cut into 5 or 10 pieces then splice it back to gather using wire-nuts. ..Hook to the other speaker. Push both speakers next to each other. ..Now, play a mono recording, and use your balance control to switch b/w the speakers. Hear a difference? ..nope. B/c signal breaks don't affect sound. IMHO.
It's not the over-simplified scenario you describe. You may not be able to hear it. Fine. Many others do. The science is there to support it. Your opinion of science is just that - an uniformed opinion and a mistaken interpretation of the physics involved.


