• Please note that Audiokarma will be offline briefly for updates early on Monday morning, September 28th.

Zenith Turntable Model - Please help.

Steve VB

New Member
I think I have a Y960, and need help finding the model of the turntable so i can purchase a new cartridge. If you know the model, please let me know. I have the picture for you.

Thank you
 

Attachments

  • zenith y960.jpg
    zenith y960.jpg
    66.9 KB · Views: 63
Register to hide this ad
^ yep, sure looks like a BSR changer to me. It made me wonder too so I looked it up. Apparently Zenith used BSR changers quite often. Who would have guessed...
 
^ yep, sure looks like a BSR changer to me. It made me wonder too so I looked it up. Apparently Zenith used BSR changers quite often. Who would have guessed...

Really. Ugh. I liked Collaro(used by Magnavox). Didn't Zenith usually use V-M except the TOTL where/when they used the inhouse model ?

Built inhouse best Zenith changer:
 
They did most of the time. I'm not exactly sure when, but from what I've seen, it seems like early to mid 70s is when they started using BSRs too.

I always thought their built inhouse changer was really cool. When I was a kid, a friends parents had a Zenith console stereo. The changer was older but I remember the built in 45 rpm stacker spindle. That was something as some many stacker spindles that you slid onto the regular spindle made noise or affected wow and flutter.
 
I always thought their built inhouse changer was really cool. When I was a kid, a friends parents had a Zenith console stereo. The changer was older but I remember the built in 45 rpm stacker spindle. That was something as some many stacker spindles that you slid onto the regular spindle made noise or affected wow and flutter.
They were pretty neat. I had two consoles with those changers over the years. One was old enough that it still had the cobra tonearm and the other had the slim tubular tonearm and 2g cartridge.
 
Thank you for the insight and the very fast responses. I took a picture of the cartridge this morning to help further the discussion.
 

Attachments

  • Cartridge.jpg
    Cartridge.jpg
    51.9 KB · Views: 30
Really. Ugh. I liked Collaro(used by Magnavox). Didn't Zenith usually use V-M except the TOTL where/when they used the inhouse model ?

Built inhouse best Zenith changer:

1964??

Now THAT looks like a nice changer! Nice diet that Zenith put that changer on. Slim and light weight.

Compare to the 1964 Garrard Model 50:
47F00560-D32C-4420-8F9A-E78AC484CDC4.jpeg
 
After Zenith phased out their Micro-Touch 2G tonearm they also used Garrard record changer mechanisms. Some were pretty decent -- I restored one from 1979 which had a Shure M75 cartridge on it, the MC9020:

https://reverb.com/item/4647768-vin...tomatic-turntable-very-good-working-condition

r4tmwnoihpyacul0scbd.jpg
 
There were good and bad models from BSR, Garrard, etc.

The last BSR I worked on was one of the later cheapies with the plastic platter. It was a total piece of ****. It ran way fast, and the WOW and flutter were off the charts. I've had others with steel platters, and they were OK. The upscale models with alloy platters, A/S, and MM cartridges are supposed to be fairly competent.

I had a Garrard 40B, and it was decent for a low end machine. Easy to service, too. I had a Model 70, and it looked nice, like it should have been fairly good, but it was a piece of junk. I could not make the auto mechanism behave, and I scrapped it. There are other Garrards that are known to be crap and a pain to service. Maybe that was one of them? I am not an expert on them.

Going by the few I have messed with, Magnavox / Collaro seemed to be decent and not too hard to work on.
 
There were good and bad models from BSR, Garrard, etc.

The last BSR I worked on was one of the later cheapies with the plastic platter. It was a total piece of ****. It ran way fast, and the WOW and flutter were off the charts. I've had others with steel platters, and they were OK. The upscale models with alloy platters, A/S, and MM cartridges are supposed to be fairly competent.

I had a Garrard 40B, and it was decent for a low end machine. Easy to service, too. I had a Model 70, and it looked nice, like it should have been fairly good, but it was a piece of junk. I could not make the auto mechanism behave, and I scrapped it. There are other Garrards that are known to be crap and a pain to service. Maybe that was one of them? I am not an expert on them.

Going by the few I have messed with, Magnavox / Collaro seemed to be decent and not too hard to work on.

I liked the older BSR's. The original BSR McDonald's were nice. Later so many brands became plastic junk. One of the big reasons that CD's became so popular was that so many turntables that the general public was exposed to were absolute crap. Instead for form following function, function followed form.
 
Back
Top Bottom