The problem with CVT's is the internals destroy the case and other main parts when they fail so cost big $ to replace. Maybe $4,500 US plus install is nothing to most people now days and many don't keep their vehicles very long.
Regular AT's can be rebuilt for a reasonable price and generally last longer as CVT's are for light duty use only.
With it and rusting issues on some brands I would would vote with my wallet as it just promotes throw away vehicles which those manufactures want.[/QUO
Was happy to find out today that the Nissan -Trail has a 4 speed tranny!
They still call it the X-Trail here. Same 2.5/4cyl QR25DE engine as the T-30/T-31 and T-32 as far as I know. I've had three 4x4 T-30s since 2001/2 when we first got them in Australia. The first two did nearly 180,000km each under lease with absolutely nothing go wrong. A few sets of tyres and regular servicing. My current one has 130,000km on it and is only on its second set of tyres! First set got 80,000+km. I bought it about 5 years ago, 2nd hand, from a retired diesel mechanic and engineer who'd babied it. I'd missed my T-30 X-trails for the last 10 years while driving new cars. It gets 10,000km oil changes and I put in its 2nd battery a few months ago. Nothing else it has ever needed.
But mine were all pre-cvt and Japanese manufacture. I have said I want to find a T-31 4x4 without CVT, but they are getting long in the tooth and hard to find. I don't want the current model T-32, it's too small in load carrying, cramped inside, the tail gate opens way too low (I hit my head) and I don't like the soft plastics. I test drove one recently and it had lost all the things that made the earlier models 'fun'.
I love Nissans.
Copy that m'8. Me 2. This X at 180k still runs still like a scared rabbit and burns not a drop of oil! Only had to repair the driver's rear wheel hub (bubbling paint)...$350 fixed and painted. They are bloody great SUV's! Other than one ball joint...no $$$ into it. Mind you it does look Army in outer design.
Q