View attachment 2482613View attachment 2482616View attachment 2482618View attachment 2482619View attachment 2482621View attachment 2482622View attachment 2482623View attachment 2482625View attachment 2482626View attachment 2482627
This thread is amazing. I am extremely happy I found it. I have read the entire thread. Will read it again shortly. Thank you for identifying inductors 1025 and 1168. I have yet to identify 2 yellow rectangular caps (8402 and the other label might be obscured by the cabinet wall) and 3 inductors: 7808, 8392, 15842. I contacted Canton and Lukas was not helpful. He gave me no information and no reason why.
I have Canton Reference 3.2 DC, 9.2 DC, and Vento 866.2 center channel. I want to replace all caps, resistors, and inductors in all my speakers but will start with the 3.2s.
What meters should I buy in order to test all the components? Multimeter, LCR meter, transistor meter, other? Any intro crosssover reading recommendations? The frequency response curve measured flat. So I am merely trying to replace the crossover like for like. I am not attempting to change the crossover schematic.
What do I need be mindful of? Common pitfalls? It looks as if the PCBs are thin and hot glued to MDF. What's the best way to remove without destroying the PCBs?
From the pics can anyone hazard a guess as to how much these crossovers cost retail? My goal is to create dream crossovers. I want to replace the 10µF and 12µF caps with Miflex caps but the cost was getting out of hand. I am also considering Jupiter Copper Foil instead of the Miflex but that would add $600 to the already bloated cost. I want to avoid electrolytic caps. Is it possible to replace the woofer caps with caps that are not electrolytic? Suggestions? Caps for the woofers are VAC. Substitutes are VDC. Is that problematic? Does voltage matter?
Following is a list of original Canton components. In parentheses are the replacement candidates.
Tweeter / Midrange
Canton Yellow rectangular cap (?)
Canton 8402 Yellow rectangular cap (?)
Resistor 10W1ΩJ (Path Audio 1 Ohm 10W)
2 Resistor 10W2.2ΩJ (Path Audio 2.2 Ohm 10W)
Resistor 10W33ΩJ (Path Audio 33 Ohm 10W)
Inductor 1168 0.25mH / 0.6 mm (Goertz CF.25 12 AWG Copper Foil)
Inductor 1168 3.3mH / 1.32 mm (Goertz CF3.3 12 AWG Copper Foil)
Inductor 15842 (?)
Canton MKT 1µ5 J 100 VDC (Miflex KPCU Copper Foil 600 VDC)
Canton MKP 4µ7 J 160VDC (Miflex KPCU Copper Foil 600 VDC)
Canton MKP 10µ J 160VDC (Jantzen Alumen Z 100 VDC)
Canton MKP 12µ J 160VDC (Jantzen Alumen Z 100 VDC 10µF +2.2µF = 12.2 µF)
4 Duelund 0.01 µF JDM Copper Bypass 600 VDC (not part of the original crossover)
Woofer
Canton 100 µF 35 VAC TF-F Bipolar 1664 (Jantzen Standard Z 400 VDC)
Canton 470 µF 23 VAC R-F Bipolar 6440 (Jantzen EleCap 100 VDC)
Canton 1000 µF 23 VAC R-F Bipolar 4340 (Kaisei Radial Non-Polarized Audio 25 VDC)
Canton BLM 7808 (?)
Canton BLM 8392 (?)
2 Resistor 10W68RJ (Path Audio 68R Ohm 10W)
View attachment 2482828
This is my way to write crossover schematic, pull out then flip, take picture,put them in collage together and start to drow
For a low cost multifunction tester you can buy one of these types:
https://www.ebay.de/itm/Newest-3-7V-version-of-inductor-capacitor-ESR-meter-DIY-MG328-multifunction-test/272570921649?ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649
They may not be as accurate as an Atlas tester but for the money are hard to beat. I have compared the readings with my 2 Fluke meters and they were very close.
As Bijan said, you remove the crossover by removing the brass nuts from the 2 studs in the center of the coils. Note: being brass the studs and nuts have no effect on the inductance of the coils. When re-installing the nuts I paint a bit of fingernail polish over the end of the nut and stud to lock them in place.
All of the caps in your crossovers are MKT and MKP film including the yellow ones.
I'm pretty sure they not all MKT,some of them are MKP,they are labelled like that and people from Canton confirmed me. They using capacitors from Kemet/Arcotronics some of them are really good. I'm compared some Kemet MKP R75 4.7uf and they are really good. I know people who change Mundorf with Kemet MKP DC Link series in their crossovers.
For a low cost multifunction tester you can buy one of these types:
https://www.ebay.de/itm/Newest-3-7V-version-of-inductor-capacitor-ESR-meter-DIY-MG328-multifunction-test/272570921649?ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649
They may not be as accurate as an Atlas tester but for the money are hard to beat. I have compared the readings with my 2 Fluke meters and they were very close.
As Bijan said, you remove the crossover by removing the brass nuts from the 2 studs in the center of the coils. Note: being brass the studs and nuts have no effect on the inductance of the coils. When re-installing the nuts I paint a bit of fingernail polish over the end of the nut and stud to lock them in place.
All of the caps in your crossovers are MKT and MKP film including the yellow ones. If you look closely at the yellow ones you might find their values molded into the casing. Sometimes they are that way rather than being ink printed.
Some people will advise you not to upgrade the MKT caps, or to change the air-core coils to ribbon, or to upgrade the resistors. I am not one of those people. I am using Jantzen and Mundorf ribbon foil coils all through my crossovers, including the woofer section.
I also use Jantzen Silver-Z caps in the tweeter section, and Z-Standard everywhere else.
I am also using Mills and Mundorf M-Resist (Supreme and Classic). In my opinion they are better that what appears to be MOX resistors in your crossovers.
A couple on notes of caution:
Be careful concerning the resistance of the coils. Ribbon foil usually have a lower DCR than air core and if you lower the circuit resistance to much the coils can easily start to oscillate, and bad things happen after that. So you might need to plan on adding a small value resistor in series with the coil to maintain the same DCR as the original circuit.
I would be careful concerning adding bypass caps to foil caps. I did this, liked it at first, but with time noticed that the bypass caps added an effect to the sound that I did not like, something like a parallel signal slightly out of phase with the main signal. It did weird things to the imaging and I ended up removing all of the bypass caps. A 0.1µF or 0.01µF bypass added to an elco did not have any unwanted effects.
Have fun, but be aware that changing all of the components in the crossovers can make small changes in resistance that can change the voicing and balance of the drivers. You have to be ready to take a lot of time and make small changes to make the speakers sound their best. For this reason I made small external enclosures for the crossovers fitted to the rear of my speakers, allowing me to make changes in a few minutes without having to remove drivers to get at the crossovers.
Cheers,
James
Can you tell me why some put cople of capacitor with same value in parallel? What is achieved with that? View attachment 2482961
Is this pic really 1.2 DC crossovers? Is it me or are these crossovers not impressive? The 1.2's were top of the line. Shouldn't the crossovers be very impressive? I am not impressed at all with my 3.2 crossovers. Are my expectations unrealistic? Do you get superb crossovers only in $20k speakers?
What type of input/output terminals are these? Screw on?

Hello! Im new to tis site.
Im working on a Canton GLE 430.2 and I need new capacitors. Been searching all over but I cant find any place to buy them.
Anybody that can help?
No 1 is 4,7 µF 35Vac 1882
No 2 is 6,8 µF 23Vac 3779
No 3 is 8,2 µF 23Vac 2374
After reading all the pages in this tread I am thinking of trying the Jantzen cross cap that was linked to in another page but I`m a bit confused about Vc and Vac. The once that is original on the Canton crossover is 35Vac and 23Vac. The jantzen is 400Vc. Can I still use them?
For a low cost multifunction tester you can buy one of these types:
https://www.ebay.de/itm/Newest-3-7V-version-of-inductor-capacitor-ESR-meter-DIY-MG328-multifunction-test/272570921649?ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649
They may not be as accurate as an Atlas tester but for the money are hard to beat. I have compared the readings with my 2 Fluke meters and they were very close.


