For audio frequencies one can do much better just with audio card in computer. Software like TruRTA handles this job (even free version ) just fine. For higher frequencies it is better then get modern DDS based device.
Tube based measurement gear cannot be really trusted.
I have the later signal generator that has rotary switches to dial in the frequency rather than the fully variable control. Mine clocks in somewhere around 5% THD, but it needs a re-cap. I can see some 60hz hum riding on whatever frequency I have it set for. Its still fine for signal tracing though.
For audio frequencies one can do much better just with audio card in computer. Software like TruRTA handles this job (even free version ) just fine. For higher frequencies it is better then get modern DDS based device.
Tube based measurement gear cannot be really trusted.
You will want to recap your 377. As I recall, some of those discrete electrolytic caps under the deck are in the signal path. If they have dried up, that can really increase the distortion level significantly.
Dave
Cool that it still works! I gave one like it away back in 1980 along with a magic eye cap tester and a huge old Eico scope.
"Better" depends on what you're doing. For non-scientific signal injection/tracing, give me a sweet old tube unit every time. In addition to being a useful and easy-to-operate tool, they look great even when they're not in use.
FWIW, I love it when people are able to restore and use old test equipment, particularly when working on contemporary (old) gear. It's a new lease on life for these fantastic, inaccurate beauties. Bring it on!
Mike
Th RF scope I got for my buddy, was the newer one, don't remember the model, but he had been looking for that one... Maybe I can calibrate it against that "high end" one you got...
Didn't remember that was RF... I hear using a sound card is the way to go, but I don't have a portable computer!!!! Vista won't work with wireless...This Eico will be close enough for what I do anyway...
Thanks