• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

fisher 400

drumhead904

New Member
Does anyone have experience with a Fisher 400 stereo tube receiver? I have never owned a tube amp or receiver. I have owned many Marantz, Pioneer sx, Sansui, et.... functioning properly would the sound be warmer with the Fisher?
 
Register to hide this ad
Quite a few of us have experience. Audiodon, Dave, Larry & myself are a few. I own a modified by myself Fisher 400.

What is your inquiry?
 
I just purchased one, should arrive in a day or two. Just looking for another fun project to mess with.
 
I have two 400’s and they sound wonderful. I will be rotating one back into use soon. I haven’t listened to it since I rebuilt the crossovers in my Forte’s so I want to hear it in all its glory again. I’m currently listening to my Scott 340B. I usually go from one to the other for a comparison of two nice receivers from the same era.
 
That's like asking Vintage Chevy owners (those over 55) if they know about '63-'67 "String-Ray's, or the ultimate sleeper, a '62 Belair 2dr with a 409 and close ratio 4spd?
 
That's like asking Vintage Chevy owners (those over 55) if they know about '63-'67 "String-Ray's, or the ultimate sleeper, a '62 Belair 2dr with a 409 and close ratio 4spd?

In late 1969 and still a teen I started worked at the Chrysler main engineering plant as a lab tech. I could take out any Chrysler product on the road for evaluation.

Hemi Cudas. 440 six pack GTX, 340 Dusters. I almost lost my mind.....
 
Does anyone have experience with a Fisher 400 stereo tube receiver? I have never owned a tube amp or receiver. I have owned many Marantz, Pioneer sx, Sansui, et.... functioning properly would the sound be warmer with the Fisher?

You will find that a restored Fisher tube receiver will have exceptional imaging (very holographic and 3D) and a tonal richness that dry-sounding 1970s Japanese solid state receivers cannot match.
 
The Fisher receivers are excellent.

I was thinking more along the 500 receiver but one just popped up quite close to me, and Larry sure speaks highly of the 400's voicing, and I had quite the fun time working on my Fisher integrated, so I went for it.

I think it is quite a testament that the OP should consider that I have seen quite a number of people come and go thru here since I have started and I have yet to see anyone disappointed with these Fishers after they get them restored, and that speaks volumes considering the number of other brand amps built over the years, and yet these old Fishers are still cherished by so many.
 
Back
Top Bottom