Can't help you there, however most headphones require more than 100mWI fear my most used amp wouldn't even deliver 0.1 W @ 8 Ohm. It still good enough to drive most of my headphones, though.
Greetings from Munich!
Manfred / lini
I guess I'm referring to some the of larger High-End headphones, I've seen some go has high as a 1W requirement. In either case, this poll was really intended for amplifiers driving loudspeakers, not headphones.OTB: Then you must either be used to comparatively inefficient headphones or listen in very high volumes. Mind you, even an old AKG K240M already delivers 88 dB(SPL) at 1 mW...
Greetings from Munich!
Manfrd / lini
Good thing I change the poll to multiple answers allowedMain system: biamped, 80 wpc to the woofers, 35 wpc to the mids/tweets.
Shop system: 100wpc.
Computer system: 35 wpc.
Dining/Living room system: biamped, 30 wpc to the woofer, 10wpc to the tweeter.
Steering away from the original posters theme, but humor me. If you could only have one, which would it be? And why?Lets see
McIntosh MC 501 mono blocks 500wpc
McIntosh MC 402 stereo amp, 400wpc
McIntosh MC 2300, stereo amp, 300wpc
McIntosh MC 275 X 2 mono blocked 180wpc
or one @ 90wpc
Acurus DIA 100 Mk II 100wpc
Sansui BA-F1 110wpc
Sansui AU 717 85wpc
Sansui AU 519 70wpc
No sense getting into AV and small tubes
I would pick 2x McIntosh MC 501 mono blocks 500wpcSteering away from the original posters theme, but humor me. If you could only have one, which would it be? And why?
The MC501 mono blocks, they sound awesome, great bass tight percussion response, enough power and headroom to drive most speaker.Steering away from the original posters theme, but humor me. If you could only have one, which would it be? And why?
Hey there 4.2.7,The MC501 mono blocks, they sound awesome, great bass tight percussion response, enough power and headroom to drive most speaker.
I've changed my mind. I'll take all of them please!I would pick 2x McIntosh MC 501 mono blocks 500wpc
Show me the moneyI've changed my mind. I'll take all of them please!
I was I could! Taking care of my old mom and paying for two households. Guess, I'll have to be happy with what I haveShow me the money
Thanks, the 501s are a really nice setup, so warm and clear, but really a lot of mac amps are like that.
I wish I was still taking care of my mom, trust me that's far far more important and rewarding.I was I could! Taking care of my old mom and paying for two households. Guess, I'll have to be happy with what I haveIt sounds great, but you're in a totally different league!
Agreed. Sorry for your lose. My mom is 80, not sure how much longer......Turns out, out her four kids, I'm the only one that steps up. That is an obligation and is rewarding. Needless to say, not happy with my siblings.I wish I was still taking care of my mom, trust me that's far far more important and rewarding.
I wish I could find it now, but it was in an old stereo magazine. It had a graph age V.S. watts required. The higher the age, the lower the watts. Some truth to it. I don't crank to 120db, like I used to 15-20 years ago. Now loud for me is 95db. Normal level for me is 80-85db.80 watts per channel @ 8 ohms for my Denon. I don't use anywhere close to that, even though my Infinity RSb speakers could take it, my ears cannot.
A-10 Rocks! I had an A-7 in 1978 when I was 14 years old, my first real HiFiAs you can see in my signature I have quite an assortment of "high powered" gear sold at your local K-Mart back in the 70's and 80's. Most of it I'm sure puts out an underwhelming 3-5 watts/ch.
So in actuality my main amp is an Onkyo A-10 Dual Mono monster rated at 85 watts per but her headroom is enormous with the big power supply caps totaling 52k uF.
Carver? This is exactly what my C-500's are.8 ohms, 250 Watts, 0.003% THD