You may find this book interesting:
Kill Your Idols: A New Generation of Rock Writers Reconsiders the Classics
In it, a number of 'music critics' examine the so-called 'great records' and.....well you should just read for yourself.
A lot of what used to be considered good rock, when examined critically, fails to measure up.
...they just want to dance.
The problem faced now a days is fads trends and POPularity. the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s, saw a major generalization of musical style and each "ushered" in the next era of hits where as now in the 2000s you may listen to any given musician, band, artist or what have you and liken it to something that came before it. Having no originality left we can no longer generalize an artist as the best. Todays music is just a great big mashup of all that came before it and it boils down to individual taste. I am 23 years old, and you ask me to name the biggest and the baddest and the stones will still pop in my head on top![]()
I regret being born in this era lol, I would have gladly drove around the U.S throughout the 80s just to listen to bands. I do like modern rock I mean don't get me wrong but there is not as much flash to live performances anymore.
I'm listening to a German band, The Notwist. They put on one of the most interesting "rock" (its more electronic, but there are guitars) shows I've seen. At one point a Nintendo Wii controller was controlling much of what was happening sound-wise.
I realize that somewhat obscure electro-rock-indie-whatever isn't for everybody. And that's what I like about music today. I don't have to like what 500,000 other people like.
Jack Lord, you and I, for example, are always in a bit of a tiff about my dislike of the Beatles. Or rather, my simple lack of worship of them. Maybe its just the different musical atmospheres we grew up with, then. DIY was big when I was in college. You made the music you wanted to hear, because nobody else was making it. And everybody had a band, not a band they played in but their own band almost, that they were really into. Mine was Galaxie 500, FWIW. That band broke up in 1991. Last year, the guitarist/singer went around with his wife, and did a couple of shows where they just did Galaxie 500 songs (though they had their own different band, and had been in a band called Luna together). So every Galaxie 500 band came out of the woodwork to see them, and it was fantastic. Like a high-school reunion,but with people you'd never met. Just a small common interest. And there was something special about it because this was "our" band. We didn't share it with 10 million people. It wasn't U2, where every kind of person on the planet would show up. No, a certain type of people like Galaxie 500. And if you did, you were more or less family.
I played a Galaxie 500 song at an open mic night and some dude I didn't know just hugged me afterwards for playing it. You don't get that for playing a Stones song.
Kids these days aren't much different than that. They don't want their musical cultural movement. They want their musical family.
If anybody really wants to understand where rock went, and why those types of bands aren't big now, I highly recommend "loudQUIETloud: A film about the Pixies" and "Tell Me Do You Miss Me", a documentary of the farewell tour of the band Luna. Another great one, about aging as an independent musician, specifically in the modern punk rock world is "The Other F Word", about being in a punk rock band and becoming a father, juggling the reality that you aren't going to change the world or fill stadiums, with a love of the music, and a love of not wanting to do what you did when you were 20.
I've seen things you wouldn't believe. Hardcore bands at the Shoulder of Orion Club. I watched the still youthful Stones from the second row of the Capital Centre. Manitoba at CBGBs, Zappa at the Warner, Thunders at Irving Plaza, the Allmans at the Beacon. Miles and Carlos jaming together, the Dead under a haze of mushrooms. Fugazy's finale.
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time for Rock & Roll to die.
Where's the little dove flying away? Needs that extra touch.Sounds like something I'd like to read.
The thesis would depend on the criteria for "good rock". So much of what sold heavily and filled concert halls and stadiums back in the day is stuff I have little interest in revisiting now while some of the stuff out of the mainstream from the same timeframe remains artfully constructed and engaging.
I feel the same about too much "classic" film. So much from "the Golden Age" is claptrap, though bits here and there are excellent.
My thinking is that only about 10% of any art media really stands the test of time, worthy of the name "classic".
I'd be as interested in what the author would think "measures up" as fails.
I went to hundreds of concerts in my younger days and saw pretty much all the biggies and while I realize many of them were very skillful musicians, performers and entertainers, most were not "artists" in my sense of the word, lacking any real timeless message, or absent that (which is valid) any primal spirit. I saw a lot of great performances of truly mediocre forgetable material that sold in the millions.
That 10% rule for me seems to apply to art of all types and ages. Good is awfully subjective, but mass appeal sure ain't any measure that I can see.
...Why would a critic (or anyone else) have to know anything about the artist or the particular work in question to have a valid opinion on the music ?

Some of the albums skewered include Sgt. Pepper, Dark Side of the Moon, Horses (Patti Smith), Joshua Tree (U2), Exile on Main Street (Rolling Stones), etc.
Now I admit that some of these have aged badly, and that I would not even consider owning or listening to others (Horses, Exile), I do think that Sgt. Pepper and DSOM are still interesting, even if I have not spun them recently. I have never owned any Led Zeppelin, or a lot of the music reviewed in the book, and though I did pick up a copy of Joshua Tree, I don't know where it is now. The review of that album is priceless! I don't think I could listen to it now without laughing hysterically.
...I have never owned any Led Zeppelin...
Music critics have no more say on what's good than anybody else, in an art form like rock and roll.
Music critics have no more say on what's good than anybody else, in an art form like rock and roll.