kfa888
Addicted Member
The L100t, and especially the L100t3 will crush the L100 Century and HPM 100 in every way.
But can they beat up my dad?
The L100t, and especially the L100t3 will crush the L100 Century and HPM 100 in every way.
But can they beat up my dad?
HPM 100s? Has anybody measured them?
It's certainly the case with L100/4311.... :yes:
As a 4-way with a supertweeter kicking in at 12 kHz, I would not expect HPM 100 to have rolled-off highs, no, but I'm looking for verification of that, because it's clearly shown in the published response:
http://audiokarma.org/forums/showthread.php?p=534709#post534709
They are certainly "forward" in the midrange, judging from that, as well....
Why is that an issue?
If the speaker is accurate, it will faithfully reproduce whatever type of music is sent to it.
Is there something inherent in one type of music as opposed to another which would necessitate using different speakers to play them?![]()
No they are not the same speaker, The L100t, and especially the L100t3 will crush the L100 Century and HPM 100 in every way.
Huh? I just spent 2 hours doing the initial sanding with #120 this afternoon on a pair of HPM-100s and it sure seemed like real walnut veneer to me. I'll do the light follow up with #220 tomorrow before re-staining them. Also, when I took the speakers out prior to starting in on them, I was impressed that the front baffle board was 1" thick. No wonder these pups are heavy. I'm debating whether or not to recap them before I sell them...I've never heard the HPM-900's so I cant do a sound comparison with the JBL's. I know the JBL L100t's and the L100t3's are easier to refinish because they're veneer and not the cheap wood imitation material. Also, I don't think the cones on the JBL's fall apart, so you don't have to go searching for a useable woofer or two, or invest in a recone job.:yes: Brad
Huh? I just spent 2 hours doing the initial sanding with #120 this afternoon on a pair of HPM-100s and it sure seemed like real walnut veneer to me. I'll do the light follow up with #220 tomorrow before re-staining them. Also, when I took the speakers out prior to starting in on them, I was impressed that the front baffle board was 1" thick. No wonder these pups are heavy. I'm debating whether or not to recap them before I sell them...
Oh... Well then, never mind...He was referring to HPM-900's, not 100's.
Jeff
Just opinion of course, but overall, the L100t is better, and less fatiguing than the HPM100's. I have had HPM 100's and currently have L100t's and HPM1500's. I prefer the sound of the JBL's over both hpm's, but the 1500's are unbeatable on bass, and the super tweeters have that campy weirdo retro thing you just can't get in another speaker. Both are staying FORVEVER!
Also, the JBL's are monolithic in shape, and veneered on all four sides. Look completely sensible pulled out from the walls a foot or two. No stands necessary. (Wife disagrees of course)
well here it is, and no, bobby, there were absolutely no marks put on these speakers. Great seller and DAMN!!! is all I can say about your McIntosh gear. 1200W per channel!!! Also, I have the HPM-100's still and tried them out, JBL on A and HPM on B. No comparison, JBL all they way.
And bigger boxes, and redesigned crossovers, and proper tuning, and....Perhaps if one were to add some JBL drivers to the HPM-100's........:thmbsp: Brad