Random Thoughts or Whatever

[DeadRock]

Really though, doesn't it? I mean, after we're gone, the lens through which we view the world disappears, at least as far as we can perceive. Can we not say then, that for each of us, the world ceases to exist when we die, thus proving that it did in fact "revolve around us" when we were alive?

Today's dimestore philosophy.

Only if you lack empathy generally and otherwise default to "the self" rather than "the collective" in matters effecting others.

 

[nailer]

'It's too heavy."

It's my brother.

 

[nailer]

Really though, doesn't it? I mean, after we're gone, the lens through which we view the world disappears, at least as far as we can perceive. Can we not say then, that for each of us, the world ceases to exist when we die, thus proving that it did in fact "revolve around us" when we were alive?

Today's dimestore philosophy.

Ummm ... no.

 

[noogies]

Only if you lack empathy generally and otherwise default to "the self" rather than "the collective" in matters effecting others.

Ummm ... no.

Sorry, I was getting a little macro for my audience, I guess. I was thinking in a larger scale "nature of existence" and perception thereof sort of way.

Perhaps a little heavy for the purposes of this thread. Apologies.

 

[Shominy]

Really though, doesn't it? I mean, after we're gone, the lens through which we view the world disappears, at least as far as we can perceive. Can we not say then, that for each of us, the world ceases to exist when we die, thus proving that it did in fact "revolve around us" when we were alive?

Today's dimestore philosophy.

No it isn't to macro, for me anyway. I think about existential problems almost daily.
Epistemology.
Temporal philosophy.
the list goes on...

 

[nailer]

Sorry, I was getting a little macro for my audience, I guess. I was thinking in a larger scale "nature of existence" and perception thereof sort of way.

Perhaps a little heavy for the purposes of this thread. Apologies.

None needed here, it's all in good fun.

 

[Quadman2]

OK, let's re-set my "dimestore phil".

Was trying to "lighten up" the thread, by:

playing with words= "black holes" do "suck"=gravity attracts and the entities within the universe revolve, so why not people and "black"=Black Matter=negative..


So, was making a general statement bout negative people, and trying to manipulate words. But it just shows to go ya how...words can get in the way!

So, next time I'll write a song. Randomly... on purpose.


Q

 

[DeadRock]

Sorry, I was getting a little macro for my audience, I guess. I was thinking in a larger scale "nature of existence" and perception thereof sort of way.

Perhaps a little heavy for the purposes of this thread. Apologies.

No need for apologies....

 

[Shominy]

For years, it has been believed that electric bulbs emit light, but recent information has proven otherwise. Electric bulbs don’t emit light; they suck dark. Thus, we call these bulbs Dark-Suckers.


The Dark-Sucker Theory and the existence of dark-suckers prove that dark has mass and is heavier than light.

First, the basis of the Dark-Sucker Theory is that electric bulbs suck dark. For example, take the Dark-Sucker in the room you are in. There is much less dark right next to it than there is elsewhere. The larger the Dark-Sucker, the greater its capacity to suck dark. Dark-Suckers in the parking lot have a much greater capacity to suck dark than the ones in this room.

As it is with all things, Dark-Suckers don’t last forever. Once they are full of dark, they can no longer suck. This is proven by the dark spot on a full Dark-Sucker.

A candle is a primitive Dark-Sucker. A new candle has a white wick. You can see that after the first use, the wick turns black, representing all the dark that has been sucked into it. If you put a pencil next to the wick of an operating candle, it will turn black. This is because it got in the way of the dark flowing into the candle. One of the disadvantages of these primitive Dark-Suckers is their limited range.

There are also portable Dark-Suckers. In these, the bulbs can’t handle all the dark by themselves and must be aided by a Dark Storage Unit. When the Dark Storage Unit is full, it must be either emptied or replaced before the portable Dark-Sucker can operate again.

Dark has mass. When dark goes into a Dark-Sucker, friction from the mass generates heat. Thus, it is not wise to touch an operating Dark-Sucker. Candles present a special problem as the mass must travel into a solid wick instead of through clear glass. This generates a great amount of heat and therefore it’s not wise to touch an operating candle-type Dark-Sucker.
Also, dark is heavier than light. If you were to swim just below the surface of the lake, you would see a lot of light. If you were to slowly swim deeper and deeper, you would notice it getting darker and darker. When you get really deep, you would be in total darkness. This is because the heavier dark sinks to the bottom of the lake and the lighter light floats at the top. This is why it is called light.
Finally, we must prove that dark is faster than light. If you were to stand in a lit room in front of a closed, dark closet, and slowly opened the closet door, you would see the light slowly enter the closet. But since dark is so fast, you would not be able to see the dark leave the closet.




So, the next time you see what is called an electric bulb, remember that it is really a Dark-Sucker.

 

[Quadman2]

For years, it has been believed that electric bulbs emit light, but recent information has proven otherwise. Electric bulbs don’t emit light; they suck dark. Thus, we call these bulbs Dark-Suckers...

So, the next time you see what is called an electric bulb, remember that it is really a Dark-Sucker.

Great read Shom!

Somethin' to "chew" on this day, eh?

Q

 

[nailer]

Real licorice lollypops are dark suckers.

 

[Pio1980]

For years, it has been believed that electric bulbs emit light, but recent information has proven otherwise. Electric bulbs don’t emit light; they suck dark. Thus, we call these bulbs Dark-Suckers.


The Dark-Sucker Theory and the existence of dark-suckers prove that dark has mass and is heavier than light.

First, the basis of the Dark-Sucker Theory is that electric bulbs suck dark. For example, take the Dark-Sucker in the room you are in. There is much less dark right next to it than there is elsewhere. The larger the Dark-Sucker, the greater its capacity to suck dark. Dark-Suckers in the parking lot have a much greater capacity to suck dark than the ones in this room.

As it is with all things, Dark-Suckers don’t last forever. Once they are full of dark, they can no longer suck. This is proven by the dark spot on a full Dark-Sucker.

A candle is a primitive Dark-Sucker. A new candle has a white wick. You can see that after the first use, the wick turns black, representing all the dark that has been sucked into it. If you put a pencil next to the wick of an operating candle, it will turn black. This is because it got in the way of the dark flowing into the candle. One of the disadvantages of these primitive Dark-Suckers is their limited range.

There are also portable Dark-Suckers. In these, the bulbs can’t handle all the dark by themselves and must be aided by a Dark Storage Unit. When the Dark Storage Unit is full, it must be either emptied or replaced before the portable Dark-Sucker can operate again.

Dark has mass. When dark goes into a Dark-Sucker, friction from the mass generates heat. Thus, it is not wise to touch an operating Dark-Sucker. Candles present a special problem as the mass must travel into a solid wick instead of through clear glass. This generates a great amount of heat and therefore it’s not wise to touch an operating candle-type Dark-Sucker.
Also, dark is heavier than light. If you were to swim just below the surface of the lake, you would see a lot of light. If you were to slowly swim deeper and deeper, you would notice it getting darker and darker. When you get really deep, you would be in total darkness. This is because the heavier dark sinks to the bottom of the lake and the lighter light floats at the top. This is why it is called light.
Finally, we must prove that dark is faster than light. If you were to stand in a lit room in front of a closed, dark closet, and slowly opened the closet door, you would see the light slowly enter the closet. But since dark is so fast, you would not be able to see the dark leave the closet.




So, the next time you see what is called an electric bulb, remember that it is really a Dark-Sucker.

I have parallel theories concerning visible/ invisible typewriters, matter/antimatter, positive/negative ("dark") energy, and the Invisigoths as the masters of such physics, including being the actual originators of the darksuckers.
Their motto, "you won't see us coming".

 

[NH-MAN]

For years, it has been believed that electric bulbs emit light, but recent information has proven otherwise. Electric bulbs don’t emit light; they suck dark. Thus, we call these bulbs Dark-Suckers.

I do not believe this, a light still emits light even in a bright environment. you would need to prove first what is the ultimate bright to prove this. example the total elimination of dark which is weird as dark is minus light.

 

[GChief]

For years, it has been believed that electric bulbs emit light, but recent information has proven otherwise. Electric bulbs don’t emit light; they suck dark. Thus, we call these bulbs Dark-Suckers.


The Dark-Sucker Theory and the existence of dark-suckers prove that dark has mass and is heavier than light.

First, the basis of the Dark-Sucker Theory is that electric bulbs suck dark. For example, take the Dark-Sucker in the room you are in. There is much less dark right next to it than there is elsewhere. The larger the Dark-Sucker, the greater its capacity to suck dark. Dark-Suckers in the parking lot have a much greater capacity to suck dark than the ones in this room.

As it is with all things, Dark-Suckers don’t last forever. Once they are full of dark, they can no longer suck. This is proven by the dark spot on a full Dark-Sucker.

A candle is a primitive Dark-Sucker. A new candle has a white wick. You can see that after the first use, the wick turns black, representing all the dark that has been sucked into it. If you put a pencil next to the wick of an operating candle, it will turn black. This is because it got in the way of the dark flowing into the candle. One of the disadvantages of these primitive Dark-Suckers is their limited range.

There are also portable Dark-Suckers. In these, the bulbs can’t handle all the dark by themselves and must be aided by a Dark Storage Unit. When the Dark Storage Unit is full, it must be either emptied or replaced before the portable Dark-Sucker can operate again.

Dark has mass. When dark goes into a Dark-Sucker, friction from the mass generates heat. Thus, it is not wise to touch an operating Dark-Sucker. Candles present a special problem as the mass must travel into a solid wick instead of through clear glass. This generates a great amount of heat and therefore it’s not wise to touch an operating candle-type Dark-Sucker.
Also, dark is heavier than light. If you were to swim just below the surface of the lake, you would see a lot of light. If you were to slowly swim deeper and deeper, you would notice it getting darker and darker. When you get really deep, you would be in total darkness. This is because the heavier dark sinks to the bottom of the lake and the lighter light floats at the top. This is why it is called light.
Finally, we must prove that dark is faster than light. If you were to stand in a lit room in front of a closed, dark closet, and slowly opened the closet door, you would see the light slowly enter the closet. But since dark is so fast, you would not be able to see the dark leave the closet.




So, the next time you see what is called an electric bulb, remember that it is really a Dark-Sucker.

QFT

 

[Mystic]

Dark-suckin' dark suckers suckin' dark in the dark while suckin'.

Autocorrect oughtta have a filed day with this.

Note: Autocorrect midfired @ "filed" cuz... well...

 

[noogies]

Autocorrect oughtta have a filed day with this.

Or not.

 

[Mystic]

Or not.

Ha ! -- a proper Autocorrect woulda auto-corrected "filed" LOL.

 

[brian222]

Yep, sometimes an innocent fart brings along some company, , , , , , , , together known as a shart...

Or as I heard it called in Wales a squit. Gives you the sound effects as well.

 

[spicer]

For years, it has been believed that electric bulbs emit light, but recent information has proven otherwise. Electric bulbs don’t emit light; they suck dark. Thus, we call these bulbs Dark-Suckers.


The Dark-Sucker Theory and the existence of dark-suckers prove that dark has mass and is heavier than light.

First, the basis of the Dark-Sucker Theory is that electric bulbs suck dark. For example, take the Dark-Sucker in the room you are in. There is much less dark right next to it than there is elsewhere. The larger the Dark-Sucker, the greater its capacity to suck dark. Dark-Suckers in the parking lot have a much greater capacity to suck dark than the ones in this room.

As it is with all things, Dark-Suckers don’t last forever. Once they are full of dark, they can no longer suck. This is proven by the dark spot on a full Dark-Sucker.

A candle is a primitive Dark-Sucker. A new candle has a white wick. You can see that after the first use, the wick turns black, representing all the dark that has been sucked into it. If you put a pencil next to the wick of an operating candle, it will turn black. This is because it got in the way of the dark flowing into the candle. One of the disadvantages of these primitive Dark-Suckers is their limited range.

There are also portable Dark-Suckers. In these, the bulbs can’t handle all the dark by themselves and must be aided by a Dark Storage Unit. When the Dark Storage Unit is full, it must be either emptied or replaced before the portable Dark-Sucker can operate again.

Dark has mass. When dark goes into a Dark-Sucker, friction from the mass generates heat. Thus, it is not wise to touch an operating Dark-Sucker. Candles present a special problem as the mass must travel into a solid wick instead of through clear glass. This generates a great amount of heat and therefore it’s not wise to touch an operating candle-type Dark-Sucker.
Also, dark is heavier than light. If you were to swim just below the surface of the lake, you would see a lot of light. If you were to slowly swim deeper and deeper, you would notice it getting darker and darker. When you get really deep, you would be in total darkness. This is because the heavier dark sinks to the bottom of the lake and the lighter light floats at the top. This is why it is called light.
Finally, we must prove that dark is faster than light. If you were to stand in a lit room in front of a closed, dark closet, and slowly opened the closet door, you would see the light slowly enter the closet. But since dark is so fast, you would not be able to see the dark leave the closet.




So, the next time you see what is called an electric bulb, remember that it is really a Dark-Sucker.

So, darkness is real, has substance, mass. Light is a voracious imitation. Down is up, chaos is order, symmetry is an illusion, beauty is a deception. Nothing exists except darkness, the ultimate reality., entropy will prevail, complete randomness having no potential. Understood.

 

[nailer]

Darkness is the absence of visible light which is why it's foolish to wander around in the dark. My toes and lower legs hate it when my conscious mind says no need for a light, I know the way around my abode.