• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Random Thoughts or Whatever

So, you are indicating that it's the genre that is the reason for the shortened chapters, an NOT the capability of the reader to deal with the longer offerings?
Yes...mostly...though I'm not at all familiar with writers or books that pander to a particular attention span as opposed to stylistic choices.. I am however sure they exist.
I know that there is some research out there, sharing that there is a lack of attention in societies today.
Indeed. A person who can't or won't read more than a page or 2 at a time is very limited by that in terms of what they choose to read, what they can actually understand, absorb, internalize, and share/discuss.
 
Yes...mostly...though I'm not at all familiar with writers or books that pander to a particular attention span as opposed to stylistic choices.. I am however sure they exist.

Indeed. A person who can't or won't read more than a page or 2 at a time is very limited by that in terms of what they choose to read, what they can actually understand, absorb, internalize, and share/discuss.

As per your first share, I suppose that some readers get used to a particular "style", esp in a series of books, say like "Jack Reacher" (Child) and prefer this kind of offerings.

And for the second point made, the ability to read, based on education/background/sight might also come into play in the understanding. So, short chapters would be preferred.

In either case, the editor would be in tune with what works best in the way the chapter length would be the most effective to offer.

Q
 
No randoms this day?:bigok:

OK...here's one. Why is it most/some/a lot of people don't want to go past the first level of thinking? Only surface/day to day reflection and discussion is wanted.

And, the "Why" of sharing is hardly ever addressed?


Just curious, is all.


Q
 
No randoms this day?:bigok:

OK...here's one. Why is it most/some/a lot of people don't want to go past the first level of thinking? Only surface/day to day reflection and discussion is wanted.

And, the "Why" of sharing is hardly ever addressed?


Just curious, is all.


Q
Because they aren't curious. Why aren't they curious.
 
Intelligence is typically defined by the ability to remember things. If you are well educated people think you are smart.
My oldest could read by his second birthday, I think he could read before he could pronounce what he was reading. He’s also easily influenced by his friends, and has a difficult time considering different opinions.
"I prefer the company of peasants because they have not been educated sufficiently to reason incorrectly" - Michel de Montaigne
 
Last edited:
Intelligence is typically defined by the ability to remember things. If you are well educated people think you are smart.
My oldest could read by his second birthday, I think he could read before he could pronounce what he was reading. He’s also easily influenced by his friends, and has a difficult time considering different opinions.
"I prefer the company of peasants because they have not been educated sufficiently to reason incorrectly" - Michel de Montaigne

Indeed Grill :thumbsup:...there is a vast difference between intelligence and wisdom!

And as for "M de M's" POV, it's far better being thought one's an idiot, than to open the mouth and remove all doubt.

Q
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom