• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Random Thoughts or Whatever

Loud, costly, and nearly impossible to control.
View attachment 2594831

You have to explain the control part as if one cannot fly down some curvy roads with these they shouldn't be trying to.

Loved my 70 TA, I don't care what car one is driving you better have some big balls if you were going to try to follow me down back roads. ( when racing I have no fear of death just to win)

A friends older brother I grew up with could get thru corners in a beater 63 chevy pickup with all mismatched tires at mind bending speeds. The old long trailing arm coil spring rear suspension was nice.
 
You have to explain the control part as if one cannot fly down some curvy roads with these they shouldn't be trying to.

Loved my 70 TA, I don't care what car one is driving you better have some big balls if you were going to try to follow me down back roads. ( when racing I have no fear of death just to win)

A friends older brother I grew up with could get thru corners in a beater 63 chevy pickup with all mismatched tires at mind bending speeds. The old long trailing arm coil spring rear suspension was nice.

It's just a fact, sophisticated suspension, fancy tires, large brakes, quick steering ratio, all the stuff, nothing makes a difference like the driver. In my experience it's always the driver that makes a real difference, the difference. And looking back, most of those fellas, you wouldn't even know till something came up.
 
I've learned so much from my errors that I'm thinking about making several more.

The funny thing, is that is exactly how a LOT of truly significant scientific discoveries have been made. "Huh, that's funny- that wasn't the expected result. What's causing that?"

In fact, there's a (hopefully rising) theory of scientific development, that says that we should be a lot more tolerant of "productive failure", and even "dead ends" in science. Not to embrace sloppiness or bad logic, but to actually recognize that a LOT of science is about failing, learning from the failure, and moving onward.

Also, I've been reading about cases in business, where people doing research, especially about human behavior patterns, have DELIBERATELY made "errors" (things that would seem like bad judgement), just to learn about the magnitude and type of results they get. No, we're not talking about endangering peoples' lives or anything like that- but giving things a chance, that seem like "bad ideas" on the face of it. Sometimes, they turn out to not be bad ideas at all. Quite a significant number of business procedures have been greatly improved, in many cases, by people willing to do this, constructively and thoughtfully...

Regards,
Gordon.
 
Back
Top Bottom