Pio1980
AK Member
It's his concept of it that's bonkers, it's not simply blobs of Chinese (or anyone else's) pollution floating around replacing blobs of cleaner air elsewhere. The pool analogy is appropriate. Doing somethings somewhere helps reduce the overall level, doing more everywhere by everyone eventially would obviously be much better. The "perfect" is the enemy of the "good", just because perfection can't be immediate doesn't mean there's no point in doing anything to address the problems now.He's not lying.
There's quite a few atmospheric studies being done by NASA all over the world (the biggest, most complex one is in Guam, IIRC), and part of what they are doing is to precisely track the plumes of pollution as they propagate around the world. Basically, what seems to be the results, is that unless the world deals with ALL countries' pollution at the same time, it isn't going to be very effective. We can't afford to give any country a pass, if we're going to do it right... they're all going to need to meet the same standards, at the same time.
Regards,
Gordon.
Last edited:
