@gkargreen yes mine has the Japanese motor and use ISO 46 oil in it because that’s what I use in some other tables.
Appreciate Bill’s comments, but he kinda put me on the spot to compare tables
The Russco Studio Pro is a massively well built table, a little maintenance along with few upgrades brings it up to top tier performance, it can hold its own with the big name idlers.
Comparing it to my TD124 it’s important to remember that my TD also has hundreds of dollars in maintenance and upgrades along with a custom plinth. The TD has a bit better W&F numbers tested at the RCA output with and actual original tube W&F machine, however I can’t tell or hear the difference.
For number freaks, or to obtain the utmost from the big motors, both tables would produce better numbers with a power control device like is sold for the Garrard 301s, but that’s really not necessary.
Each machine is extremely quiet, way below the noise floor of LPs and as Bill said, that’s not speculative, testing was done with a silent track and oscilloscope at the RCA outputs of the table.
I’d say the TD is a bit more detailed, but the Russco has more “slam” bass comes through with a bit more oomph’, but those statements are subjective based on listening sessions side by side, with comparable arms and carts.
Obviously the Thorens command more money in the current market but I’d have a very difficult time picking one over the other based on performance and/or aesthetics.
When finished you’ll have a gorgeous piece of audio equipment that preforms beyond your aural abilities, and can be passed on to the next several generations.
They are extremely satisfying to listen to, look at and interact with, a real world example of form and function…..
VR
Andy