• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

So you want to understand Stylus Shapes? Try this!

Register to hide this ad
From worst to good... how do you rank the stylus tips? Example: conical, elliptical, MicroLine contact, micro ridge, shibata, etc, etc.?
 
From worst to good... how do you rank the stylus tips? Example: conical, elliptical, MicroLine contact, micro ridge, shibata, etc, etc.?
For accurate tracing of modern post CD-4 microgroove LPs, any of the line contact tips are preferable to spherical, elliptical, biradial tips.
However, horses for courses. Pre CD-4 era LPs may be optimal with biradial /elliptical or spherical tips. Dynagroove stereophonic records were specifically cut for optimal playback with spherical tip, but nothing else was available in the pre-stereophonic era.
 
Earl: I'd rather suggest to remove that chart, as it obviously contains quite a few bugs.

Greetings from Munich!

Manfred / lini
 
Earl: AT's old chart in post #9 of Flavio's original thread over on VE looks pretty ok.

Greetings from Munich!

Manfred / lini
 
New chart instead of the other one. :D
Stylidiagrams.jpg
 
Last edited:
I don't get it: How can the contact patch of an elliptical be greater than that of a spherical with the same bearing radius? Is this a byproduct of the polishing?
 
I don't get it: How can the contact patch of an elliptical be greater than that of a spherical with the same bearing radius? Is this a byproduct of the polishing?
No it's not true unless the stylus us press g harder on the vinyl and making as larger contact area with extra force due to the smaller profile.
 
Back
Top Bottom