oldskl
Well-Known Member
Yep, we're talking pathetic pop here . . . give me SD any day of the week.
Got bubble-gum?![]()
Thats what makes this hobby so great. Theres enough different musical styles for every one.
Yep, we're talking pathetic pop here . . . give me SD any day of the week.
Got bubble-gum?![]()
No offence but my condolences.
I find their music banal, lacking, uninteresting.
don't even need to commentHall and Oates..... now we are getting somewhere.

Do I have it right when I say that Larry Carlton is the solo on that song?

sorry - but just seemed you were bashing other's when you saidHey, like I said, taste is personal, and I bet for anyone who retorted in the negative to my Hall and Oates post they themselves have artists in their collections that I would laugh at too. But I am relaxing on a long week and not in the mood to defend my PERSONAL taste to what is obviously undefendable
so I guess some thought that Hall & Oates was fair game.Granted, there is no accounting for taste
unless I had a real bigGranted, there is no accounting for taste
A fine group of musicians and a great show I am sure of. They do pride themsleves on tightness and fluidity. Now, do you know where the band name came from?![]()
I've told this story before. I saw SD during their heyday, early 70's. Actually they had a bad reputation then for being a mediocre live act. They were on a bill with Jessie Colin Young who opened. Talk about comeplete opposites. Young's band was loose and in a great musical groove. SD was as advertised. While technically great they were emotionally flat and actually pretty boring. It seems as if they have loosened up in their old age.I hope so.
cubdog
sorry - but just seemed you were bashing other's when you said
so I guess some thought that Hall & Oates was fair game.
I have no doubt many would not care for some of the stuff I listen to, but I doubt I would ever tell them
unless I had a real bigbehind it.