All three of the vintage turntables I've owned over the past 5 years (1 belt drive and 2 DDs) have had speed issues, and I have never been able to get the strobes locked in and perfectly still. Using the RPM phone app with the strobe at its most stable always reveals the platter is moving a little too fast or slow, and with some nontrivial wow/flutter.
I get that these are 40-45 year old machines and they may be a bit wonky. And I suppose the .14% W/F reading I get on my entry-level early '80s Technics is still better than, say, the current Fluance tables which only promise .2% brand new.
Am I just being too picky? There are a few videos on YouTube like this, where people say they're locking in the speed but you can still clearly see the strobe dots moving (near the end of video):
This makes me think that perhaps I'm expecting too much. OTOH I have seen, wth my own eyes, tables where the lights are rock solid and don't move at all. Is this just the difference between a cheaper vintage table and something more pricey?
Everyone says that if you're on a budget, it's better to get an old turntable than any of the new ones, but I'm starting to wonder. I guess my question is: is there anyone out there who has a basic vintage deck with none of these speed problems, or do they just come with the territory?
Thanks!
-Stephen
Just saw this thread - man, hate getting to threads late, conversation moves fast and probably is beyond what I have to say on the matter - have posted re: my experience but I want to re-post/tell it again.
1.- Started with vintage tables, DD and belt. No issues on the DD ones, speed or otherwise; had speed issues on the belt one. These were affordable turntables. Technics SL-23 (belt), Pioneer PL-400 and Technics SL-D3 for the DD ones.
2.- Started to get worried about not only possible issues, but also about unobtanium if repair was needed
3.- Got a relatively affordable new, modern turntable from one of the European most well known vendors. It was defective.
4.- Afraid of manufacturing issues, instead of replacing with the same, returned and replace with one from 'the other' vendor. My freaking luck, defective too.
5. Decided to go to modern, mass produced. AT-LP1240. Rock solid. It even received cartridges that were more expensive than the turntable! Worked great.
6.- Got the upgrade itch. No reason just wanted to move up. Considered, again, the belt driven modern turntables that the audiophiles love. Given my experience, decided against it, went again with modern, mass produced.
7. - So got a Pioneer PLX-1000 and an AT-LP7 - got both just to evaluate and in the end kept both!

8.- Extremely happy with both of them. Again, selection of cartridges, some of them more expensive than the actual turntable!
Some notes
So yes, my preference is biased in favour of modern electronics. However, there exists also some bias against them. Not sure where your WF number for the Fluance comes from, but as per
https://www.fluance.com/rt85w-refer...rntable-natural-walnut#content-Specifications
it is actually 0.07%
There is an idea that vintage ( and modern belt driven tables) will offer better specs for the money. Will leave the conclusions as an exercise to the reader.
But consider this. Take for example the LP-1240 - WF in
https://www.audio-technica.com/en-us/at-lp1240-usb is "<0.1%" - lots of comments ensue on the crappiness of Chinese manufactured turntables. BUT - then, there are measurements out there - commissioned by an Australian Hi-Fi magazine to an outside lab, if I remember correctly, wish I had the link - that measured it at very acceptable 0.05% OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT - don't hold my feet to the fire, the point is that the spec is decent.
How? well - Well it looks like when commenting, people ignore the "<" sign on the spec. LESS than - lots less. I do assume that what they list is a theoretical high value and given the price point, while they stay in the ballpark of good performance, cannot promise a specific number. That's OK, in my mind.
So, yes you can be very happy with relatively inexpensive modern electronics. Specially the AT-LP7 and the PLX-1000 - they are no slouches. I have no issue putting expensive cartridges. Some people say "super good turntable (and expensive!

) with lesser cartridge" > "ok turntable with good cartridge". Personally I disagree. IMHO a better cartridge is a better cartridge, what matters in sound are transducers (as long as properly matched). YMMV of course. So yeah I am as happy as Philip Glass in a non-denominational winter celebration!
BUT!
All that said, I pine once in a while for a beautiful vintage table - specially some the 80s DDs from Denon, Kenwood, Sansui and others. Not only those are beautiful, I do believe they are the non-plus-ultra of turntable design, perfected just as CD was about to take over the world. I do get the itch of selling something just to get them. But going back to the SL-D3 or PL-400? nah. Modern, easily serviced wins IMHO. To be fair, the D3 and the PL400, rock solid speed as measured by their own strobe.
Apologies - I know I am gonna read the rest of the thread and will notice that conversation has moved on, I am repeating what others said, etc. But, well, wanted to have say.
thnx!
v