I've been thinking about this since my earlier posts ... I don't take back any of that. But, I have to say there are some criteria missing here ...
So much of this is dependent on the tone arm. And that may be dependent on the type of cartridge preferred ... And, on top of that, what's the utility criteria?
I spin mostly LP's, but I have a pile of 78's too. So the table needs to spin 33 and 78. That sets quite a few aside - good as they are.
And having two pretty different formats means I have to be able to swap headshells and cartridges, or have two tone arms. And you'all know I'm a swapper, so that means an S or J arm that takes headshells. So that cuts out about 50% of the tables mentioned in the top ranks.
Tone arm mass is important too. I need enough that I can get a 78 cartridge/stylus in a mid-weight shell to "dig in" on the 78's; but not so heavy that if I build a really light headshell, I won't have the benefits with a very light tracking stylus ...
So, in my mind, utility drives the perception of "Best" ...
Now, if the question is best for just LP play post 1960 say, then the equation changes. Then I might move in the direction of an Oracle or something ...
But as long as I have the collection of records I do, it has to be more versatile than pure techo wizardry. I just can't live with say a carbon fiber fixed mount arm. Won't work. But they surely are good - maybe the best in their limited way ...
So specialization comes into this. Need and flexibility also.
I think we should break this thing down into best drive, best arm, and best circuitry ...
Then we'd have more to dissect