Is it the case that cassette deck technology improved over time such that later, "lower end" decks are generally better than older, "higher end" decks? Just curious if there is some general trend here. I don't have a lot of experience with cassette decks, but the few '70s era decks I had (they're gone now), certainly had issues, while the late '80s early '90s decks work flawlessly, have more features, and sound good.
Well, it really depends on the deck, make, construction etc etc....but I would mostly agree.
I do tend to go for the 80's -90's decks, once you get too far into the 90's and the early 2000's they seem to become less serviceable
I find cassette deck technology really came of age in the 80's.... I bought a TEAC V-670 new in 1988 (?) when they were new, it was quite expensive at the time, but I had that deck until about 2011, it never failed me ever.....
The only reason it went to cassette deck heaven was because I completely wore the head out, it was completely gone, and at the same time, I came upon two of the three Tascam's I have now.....but the V670 was a great deck, it sounded fantastic....made super recordings. If I ever see one with good heads, I might just grab it...!!
I'm not really interested in the 1970's cassette decks (as much as I do like the looks), they have always had fairly underwhelming performance for me, and they tend to be very expensive and have too many issues, and mostly all two head machines as well.....
I just want decks that work, record well, and sound great at the end of the day.....and I've found that with my beloved Tascam decks. There will be 70's junkies that disagree, but they should be happy, I'm not pilfering their decks!!