Beautiful! If you put another syllable in line 2, it'll be perfect. How about, "Went to a seer seeking a seance"? Then you get bonus points for alliteration too!A dowager in a conveyance
Went to a seer for a seance.
"No zombies," he said,
"Want what's in your head!"
Which put all her fears in abeyance.
I'd like to keep the emphasis on "went" (or a replacement word) and "seer," so:Beautiful! If you put another syllable in line 2, it'll be perfect. How about, "Went to a seer seeking a seance"? Then you get bonus points for alliteration too!
Now you've got one syllable too many! Sorry to be a nitpicker, but it's such a great limerick that it's worthwhile to get it just right.I'd like to keep the emphasis on "went" (or a replacement word) and "seer," so:
A dowager in a conveyance
Was sent to a seer for a seance.
"No zombies," he said,
"Want what's in your head!"
Which put all her fears in abeyance.
? You proposed adding a syllable. My version does also. Nine syllables in lines 1, 2, and 5.Now you've got one syllable too many! Sorry to be a nitpicker, but it's such a great limerick that it's worthwhile to get it just right.
Yep, you're right -- my bad. I guess it depends on which syllables can be smoothly elided to maintain the right cadence.? You proposed adding a syllable. My version does also. Nine syllables in lines 1, 2, and 5.