No need to resort to bobbittizing.
You are a sick, twisted individual.. and I say that with the utmost respect. :yes:
No need to resort to bobbittizing.
You are a sick, twisted individual.. and I say that with the utmost respect. :yes:

The woofer, if single. If you believe LE14 to be "compromised" in the VLF region, you've just never worked it correctly for this. LE14H-3, for example, is officially a "subwoofer," warranting that designation above the vintage variants largely because of its higher power handling capacity. Citation 7.4 is LE14H-1, but LE14A is certainly no slouch in that same 3.4 cuft vented alignment.I'm a little unclear on what function you're recommending the LE14 for. The middle of a 3-way (probably) or the bottom of a 3-way.
That'd be me, of course, Clearprint pads, circle templates, and my Bruning 'lectric eraser are always immediately at hand.Raise your hand if you keep a compass and scale in your desk for stuff like this.

My wife would want me to get an Autocad license like her and just be done with it. Like I need THAT learning curve.
[threadjack] Ha! to that. In a previous job, I wanted to try cad design and found http://www.alibre.com/
It's freeware! [/threadjack] :thmbsp:
Guido on LHF made 4435s into towers with staggered woofs.Think HPM-200 driver arrangement, perhaps?
The woofer, if single. If you believe LE14 to be "compromised" in the VLF region, you've just never worked it correctly for this. LE14H-3, for example, is officially a "subwoofer," warranting that designation above the vintage variants largely because of its higher power handling capacity. Citation 7.4 is LE14H-1, but LE14A is certainly no slouch in that same 3.4 cuft vented alignment.
SNIPPED FOR SINGLE SUBJECT
E'Wavers seem to be landing rehabbable LE14As for $100 a pair, less than what you were contemplating for the Dayton 15s.I'll take your word for the performance of the LE14 in the VLF with proper loading. I just think it's a very expensive driver to be using in an economy application when something cheaper and more available might do the same job. Unless I'm wrong about the price and availability?

Okay, this gets interesting. Limono has a pair of BiFlex 420A that he says will work well in a 2-way with the Ewave.
That would certainly be simpler and higher sensitivity than what I've been considering. I guess I need to dig up the T-S parameters and see if they'll work in these 5.5' cabinets.
Well, about a bizzillon pages ago Zilch posted a Charge coupled version of the Ewave crossover at my request. I set out to build it, and did so with the exception of the little resistors that the 9 volt batteries feed through. I finally ordered some the other day and should receive them any day.
For those of you that are in the dark, its a crossover typology often used by JBL (and others I suppose) in their very high end stuff which results in a much smoother treble, and overall improvement to the sound. Generally, any given cap is doubled in mfd value, and then 2 of them are used. At all the junctions of these two caps,
the positive post of a 9 volt battery is connected through a low watt high value ( I'm using 2.2 meg ) resistor.
I will shortly be reporting the effect of charge coupling the Ewave crossover and I anticipate a not so subtle improvement. Well, as soon as the resistors arrive anyway!
Russellc
You are probably aware of this but Bill at Great plains audio states these will take a 416 recone. FYI
Russellc
I'd hate to see you abandon your 3-way concept in favor of what is, in essence, E'Waved Valencia. Andyman and others have been there, and you have, yourself, with respect to 416 bass response in that cab.I may try both with the ewave in these cabs and see if the 420A plays significantly differently from the 416-8Z.