rvsixer
New Member
Good thought, but isn't pro stuff usually BIG? Recall I have a small listening/home theater/computer/hobby room, and was thinking 12" wide econowaves.If I was in the Live Music Capital of the World, I'd be looking for pro stuff.
Good thought, but isn't pro stuff usually BIG? Recall I have a small listening/home theater/computer/hobby room, and was thinking 12" wide econowaves.If I was in the Live Music Capital of the World, I'd be looking for pro stuff.
Such an enjoyable positionI have many hours stuck in the cockpit on my back bucking rivets in a 6.
I can't find a pair of donor speakers anywhere in this "live music capital of the world", and you guys have 'em gathering dust in your closets :cry: :grumpy: :drunk: !!!
Yes, yet today, maybe, though I'm having some difficulty keeping promises here of late....Zilch I'd love to hear what you have to say on the Dayton DC-250, if I read your post right and you'll be measuring them soon with the QSC/DE250.
...
I am working with some suggestions from NHT's Jack Hidley and "The one who knows." I have been able to move the forward axis down a bit by making the eWave highpass third-order per Wayne's design, and am next working on the lowpass. The Rane tech note suggests that a classic symmetrical third-order Butterworth's -15° downward tilt may be useful....
Help me, now, tan 15° = 0.2679 = opp/adj, with adj being the 10.5" C/C distance, so opp = 2.8135", no? Requiring 120° of phase shift?![]()
I'm not suggesting we need to be dead-on normal to the baffle, but we appear to be shootin' the sky presently, pending your measurements....You must be thinking that would tilt-up to on-axis because of the QSC depth.

Your trig checks. Not that I pretend to understand the rest of the process...Help me, now, tan 15° = 0.2679 = opp/adj, with adj being the 10.5" C/C distance, so opp = 2.8135", no? Requiring 120° of phase shift @ 1.6 kHz?![]()
Oh Atlanta!
![]()
O.K., who's got my Occam's Razor?
![]()
Yes. I'm still at 1.7 kHz using Jack's filter component values, and want to try to move that down more, and get rid of the Zobel tucked in the back there. Still more tricks in the bag.Judging from ZilchNutZ on components tacked-on, you're still third order on both filters?

(From page 60)I am tired tonight so I just popped the tweet and wired in the EWG. The bump in the vocals is noticable, but other than that, they sound great....I mean GREAT. I am still using the stock xover and the EWG is too high and back too far, but WOW, they sound great. ::