Yes, and you can also switch to shorter legs....![]()
...
The forward vertical lobe is symmetrical about the +7.44° (from the midpoint between woofer and waveguide) axis, the -6 dB "window" being ~+/- 12.5°.
[The Zilch effect is apparently not operative with this freestanding waveguide, indicating that it may be a baffle-derivative phenomenon....]
It's just trig to figure this out. At my 44" mic distance, the forward axis is 0.75" below the waveguide center. At twice that listening distance, 7'4", it's 5" above waveguide center. At thrice, 11' listening distance, it's 10.75" above waveguide center, according to my calcs. Set your waveguide height according to your typical listening height and distance.Ah, yeah...they are just cheap Ikea legs (8-inch) which has the middle of the waveguide at 36 inches above the floor. I can also get the legs in 4 and 6 inches.
Whats the optimum height?
Most any 12" woofer that is not designed as a subwoofer will play high enough. If you like the bass those speakers make, then go for it.
You don't have to do anything to the Yamahas to verify that the combo will work to your liking -- merely bring out the woofer leads and connect to the eWave driver/waveguide/crossover and listen to how it will sound. If you like the result, then you can commit to modding the cabs as required to complete the build. :yes:

Still no measurement gear other than the RS SPL meter and 1-octave RTA...but I have the Ewaves in new cabs and they sound good to me...
Peerless 830634 in 4.5 feet sealed.
Three times the volume must let them go quite low... :thmbsp:I rearmount woofers to help compensate for the depth of waveguides like the 152i. That's not the case with the shallow 6" square one. It's mostly about how difficult it is to get the forward axis steered where I want it to be with a minimalist crossover.... :yes:Zilch: I see that you have mounted your woofs from the front and the back. Which do you prefer? I was thinking about mounting from the back and using a 1/2 round over bit on the front of the driver hole. Do you have any thoughts about how that may effect the responce?
How are you liking those woofers? I think they sound great, even in 1.5 cu.ft. sealed.Three times the volume must let them go quite low... :thmbsp:
I'm beginning to think a lot of "how it sounds" has to do with matching the waveguide throat entrance angle to the driver exit angle. The .zma shows the resonance of this combination is occurring clear down at 720 Hz, and you can see we're working at least an octave above there and cutoff in the raw response curves, orange vs. red here:Does it still sound OK under high power/high SPL with that filter? To my ears, the D220 sounded fine on the (larger) Pyle PH714 horn, even run down to 1200 Hz or so... but some had complained, IIRC, that the D220 was "raspy" when run that low in some applications....
Still no measurement gear other than the RS SPL meter and 1-octave RTA...but I have the Ewaves in new cabs and they sound good to me...
Peerless 830634 in 4.5 feet sealed.
Nice and low. I'm listening to some Telarc soundtracks and the drum thwacks do indeed carry some weight.
I just need to watch the throttle on bass-heavy programs.
I'm beginning to think a lot of "how it sounds" has to do with matching the waveguide throat entrance angle to the driver exit angle. The .zma shows the resonance of this combination is occurring clear down at 720 Hz, and you can see we're working at least an octave above there and cutoff in the raw response curves, orange vs. red here:
![]()
We ended up a little higher than that, actually, at 1440 Hz:
![]()
Brandon (Augerpro) just demonstrated (0° - 60°, 5 dB/vertical division) that using a different driver (Beyma CP285), this waveguide can maintain horizontal pattern control down to ~1 kHz, which is why I'm thinking the exit angle thing: