• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Do you use a magnetometer or demagnetzer?

Register to hide this ad
My understanding from reading extensively here, is a properly\fully erased tape using a bulk demagnetizer will lower the noise floor by about 3db compared to depending on the deck's demag process. I think it's related to Bias noise, but it's not like I have measured the difference.
As a practical matter, I have never felt the need to bulk erase, unless the alignment of the original recording unit was poor, causing signal to be picked up by the play head, that is on an adjacent track. Assuming a correctly aligned erase head on a deck, it will miss a bit of the misaligned recorded track it is trying to erase, which can be picked up by the playback head.
 
My understanding from reading extensively here, is a properly\fully erased tape using a bulk demagnetizer will lower the noise floor by about 3db compared to depending on the deck's demag process. I think it's related to Bias noise, but it's not like I have measured the difference.
As a practical matter, I have never felt the need to bulk erase, unless the alignment of the original recording unit was poor, causing signal to be picked up by the play head, that is on an adjacent track. Assuming a correctly aligned erase head on a deck, it will miss a bit of the misaligned recorded track it is trying to erase, which can be picked up by the playback head.

Yes correct Sir The OP was talking about
use a magnetometer or demagnetzer?
I simply mentioned a Bulk Eraser because with the use of Tapes especially older ones,you don't know how good their recorded material or machines and if they were properly aligned:)
 
At the radio station we used a handheld bulk tape eraser. It. was not only good for tape cartridges, but for the cart machines, the R2R's and hand tools that picked up un unwanted polarization. That reminds me I have a couple pair of pliers and screw drivers that need to be demagnetized. Where is my bulk eraser I haven't used it in over 10 years? Its in one of my cable and accessory suit cases? fingers crossed. Haven't looked in there for years either.
 
Last edited:
Nope! Supposebly any good R2R can do the Job better or not ever need it to be done:)

Please see article below, which supports this. I am not the author and the comments following the article are not mine.
Lot's of varying opinions on this, even in instruction manuals.
Myself, I clean the heads and pinch roller on my RT-707 and sit back and enjoy the music.
I have more important things to worry about....

  1. Operating a tape recorder does not cause anything in the tape path to become magnetized. Not even a tiny bit.
    2. All parts including heads have made from materials with a natural neutral magnetic state, to which they tend to return even if deliberately magnetized.
    3. The magnetic flux required to affect a recorded tape is much higher than anything anywhere around the tape recorder, except in the erase and record head gaps. The effect of a steady-state magnetic field (a DC field) on recorded tape is first noticed as partial erasure of high frequencies, and that occurred with a field somewhere above 200 Gauss. Tape has very high coercivity by design, meaning you need a high field strength to cross the threshold above which the tape will become magnetized. That's what the bias oscillator does. By being many times hotter than the actual audio signal on the head, the bias forces the signal over the coercivity threshold into the more "linear" range of the tape. But that means it's harder to erase tape than you might think. Typical guide and head residuals were in the zero to 20 gauss range, far below tape coercivity levels.

    4. Erase and record heads are self-demagnetized by the bias oscillator, which provides an AC field in the gap that is thousands of times higher than what a de-magnetizer can induce.

    5. The field found on recorded tape is incapable of magnetizing anything. It is minuscule, and when the tape moves, it becomes an AC field, which would demagnetize if it had any effect.

    6. The effect of a DC field near or in a record head produces two measurable results: First, a significant elevation of even-order harmonic distortion, and second, an elevation in low frequency noise (a sort of gravelly sounding noise). But again, the field has to be fairly high for this to happen. You need a spectrum analyzer to differentiate even harmonics from the normal odd harmonics created in the recording process.

    7. If tape machine parts become magnetized, there is a defect in manufacture (the material doesn't have a natural, neutral magnetic state), or a defect in the tape machine, either due to a failure or design flaw. Asymmetrical bias waveforms will present a DC component, any DC on a head due to a circuit defect (bad blocking cap, for example). Demagnetizing may temporarily remove the residual, but if it creeps back, something is "broken", and needs repair or replacement.

    8. Lastly, casual use of a demagnetizing device, even if the classic proper techniques are observed (slow removal, switching of when several feet away), sometimes resulted in an increased magnetic state rather than a decrease. There's no way to tell if you are demagnetizing, or magnetizing, without further testing for the effects of magnetism. Once again, these are HF erasure of a recorded tape, or increase in noise and even-order harmonic distortion during record. Yes, you need instrumentation to do this.


I don't know who wrote that long quote above, but most of it is pretty accurate.
I hardly EVER demag....maybe once a year(?)...and I only do that just for the heck of it, just so's I can say I've done it once in awhile ...just in case.
biggrin.gif


See...I have a Gauss meter, and no matter whenever I'd check my deck with it, the magnetism was absolutely nominal. IOW, I could demag it a thousand times, and the teeny-tiny bit of needle deflection I would see on my Gauss meter would always be there. It's partly just the metal mass of the whole deck and partly the background magnetism of good ol' mother earth.

So...I never give it much thought any more, Once in a blue moon I'll demag, but it's probably not needed.
When I had my first 4-track, I use to demag ALL THE TIME....but not now with my current 16 and 2 track decks.
image.php
 
Please see article below, which supports this. I am not the author and the comments following the article are not mine.
Lot's of varying opinions on this, even in instruction manuals.
Myself, I clean the heads and pinch roller on my RT-707 and sit back and enjoy the music.
I have more important things to worry about....

  1. Operating a tape recorder does not cause anything in the tape path to become magnetized. Not even a tiny bit.
    2. All parts including heads have made from materials with a natural neutral magnetic state, to which they tend to return even if deliberately magnetized.
    3. The magnetic flux required to affect a recorded tape is much higher than anything anywhere around the tape recorder, except in the erase and record head gaps. The effect of a steady-state magnetic field (a DC field) on recorded tape is first noticed as partial erasure of high frequencies, and that occurred with a field somewhere above 200 Gauss. Tape has very high coercivity by design, meaning you need a high field strength to cross the threshold above which the tape will become magnetized. That's what the bias oscillator does. By being many times hotter than the actual audio signal on the head, the bias forces the signal over the coercivity threshold into the more "linear" range of the tape. But that means it's harder to erase tape than you might think. Typical guide and head residuals were in the zero to 20 gauss range, far below tape coercivity levels.

    4. Erase and record heads are self-demagnetized by the bias oscillator, which provides an AC field in the gap that is thousands of times higher than what a de-magnetizer can induce.

    5. The field found on recorded tape is incapable of magnetizing anything. It is minuscule, and when the tape moves, it becomes an AC field, which would demagnetize if it had any effect.

    6. The effect of a DC field near or in a record head produces two measurable results: First, a significant elevation of even-order harmonic distortion, and second, an elevation in low frequency noise (a sort of gravelly sounding noise). But again, the field has to be fairly high for this to happen. You need a spectrum analyzer to differentiate even harmonics from the normal odd harmonics created in the recording process.

    7. If tape machine parts become magnetized, there is a defect in manufacture (the material doesn't have a natural, neutral magnetic state), or a defect in the tape machine, either due to a failure or design flaw. Asymmetrical bias waveforms will present a DC component, any DC on a head due to a circuit defect (bad blocking cap, for example). Demagnetizing may temporarily remove the residual, but if it creeps back, something is "broken", and needs repair or replacement.

    8. Lastly, casual use of a demagnetizing device, even if the classic proper techniques are observed (slow removal, switching of when several feet away), sometimes resulted in an increased magnetic state rather than a decrease. There's no way to tell if you are demagnetizing, or magnetizing, without further testing for the effects of magnetism. Once again, these are HF erasure of a recorded tape, or increase in noise and even-order harmonic distortion during record. Yes, you need instrumentation to do this.


I don't know who wrote that long quote above, but most of it is pretty accurate.
I hardly EVER demag....maybe once a year(?)...and I only do that just for the heck of it, just so's I can say I've done it once in awhile ...just in case.
biggrin.gif


See...I have a Gauss meter, and no matter whenever I'd check my deck with it, the magnetism was absolutely nominal. IOW, I could demag it a thousand times, and the teeny-tiny bit of needle deflection I would see on my Gauss meter would always be there. It's partly just the metal mass of the whole deck and partly the background magnetism of good ol' mother earth.

So...I never give it much thought any more, Once in a blue moon I'll demag, but it's probably not needed.
When I had my first 4-track, I use to demag ALL THE TIME....but not now with my current 16 and 2 track decks.
image.php

This is well put!:)
 
Does this non-approach to using demagnitizers include using portables or boom boxes without demagnetizing their heads as well? I have several boomboxes and portables that are pretty decent, JVC and Panasonic. So is it worth the effort to get out the ol' Radio Shack or HandyMag demagnetizers for these units or portable cassette recorders? I play cassettes I recorded myself over the last 35 years, as well as prerecorded ones.
 
Back
Top Bottom