Funny,I think his five albums of 'standards' are absolutely brilliant.As always, I was impressed by his lyricism -
the man always had a writing gift.
But his voice failed him long ago ...
and Bob doing the great American Songbook
is even more of a joke than Rod Stewart doing it.
What is wrong with people using their knowledge about how things can and cannot work? You can patent a perpetuum mobile, but it won't work, so who cares.One cannot comment on something that is out of the relm of one's thoughts as it hasn't happened before ... If you tell people to much about the tech, they will already make a decision or an opinion whether it's good or not with zero experience with it.
That makes sense... I remember hearing about some kind of test, probably here on this forum, where an analog master tape was dubbed into digital with a very high sampling rate and the resulting dub sounded so much like the original that expert audio engineers couldn't reliably pick which one was the original analog and which was the digital dub. If that's indeed the case then it seems that any kind of processing that makes a recording sound more "analog" can be preserved in a digital mix and have it sound just like the original. I do think that most of the complaints regarding digital media have everything to do with the the way that things are mixed and mastered and little to do with the medium itself...Just thought I'd muse on the capability of physical analogue media, compared to digital.
Let's say we use 24 bit digital samples as a reference.. This gives a numeric sample range of 16777216. So the resolution is one part in 16777216.
If we allow a physical representation with similar resolution, and, let's say, use a physical element 1mm in size as the maximum value, that means we need the ability to create physical structures with mechanical resolution of 1mm/16777216 = 60pm, 60e-12m
I think that's a tall order...
This isn't about recording and playback fidelity of a particular medium. It's about euphonic distortion or mastering.
That makes sense
I drove three hours to see him in 2018 and was disappointed. He didn't play any guitar and spent the entire show seated at a piano stage right and in the rear, pretty much behind the band. The vast majority of his set list was new obscure material that none of us had ever heard. He didn't address the audience until the end of the show, at which he walked over to the center stage, glared at us for a few seconds and then walked off - to an immense standing ovation. Sigh.
That is an awesome recording of one of the greatest albums ever.Anyone who falls asleep to that is just....old.
What did the humanity gain from Elon Musk throwing a used Tesla into space? Same thing here, although on a much smaller scale.I see nothing wrong with rich people trying to move technology forward. I am sure something will be learned from this endeavor even if it fails.
What is wrong with people using their knowledge about how things can and cannot work? You can patent a perpetuum mobile, but it won't work, so who cares.
Oh, but there was.I was talking about the article, there really wasn't enough information given to imagine exactly what they are doing.