It's nice to see you repeating the same baseless claims yet again on another forum!
The SAS did do a lot of shaving of HF grooves on first play.
I have an open offer for anyone to send me the same type of record I used in my experiment, played on their TT and cartridge, to check for damage. If they send the cartridge or stylus I'll do a wear evaluation on it as well, all for free. So far only one person has done this, and the results confirmed my data, showing that his VM95ML also caused groove damage and wear.
So I have data from four VM95ML, played on three different TTs, that all says the same thing.
My current TT, while for sure not high-end, is competent and almost new, and is working properly. I've used it to play one VM95C for 500 hours, and another VM95C for 1000 hours, with only light wear. I've also showed that a VM95C and a VM95SH cause no record damage, but a VM95ML played same time caused the same divot damage seen in the SWS3 study. It seems unlikely that this TT is highly selective of only the ML stylus type for damage. It also seems unlikely the TT has mechanical problems given the extremely long life in the Conicals.
I've never said the ML was ruining records, nor that the groove damage is obvious during listening. The VM95ML I tested did indeed bottom out pretty quickly, but hitting bottom doesn't mean it is ruining records. Did you get this misinformation from the AI article?