Some say the m97xe is boring, Others say it is smooth, uncolored, free from any resonant peaks and distortion. Very uncolored gear sounds boring to the untrained listener.
How do you know what is on the record ? Because you like it does that make it good ? Perhaps others disagree and feel that a lot of audiophile equipment has a gimmicked sound that is not natural.

How do you know what is on the record ? Because you like it does that make it good ? Perhaps others disagree and feel that a lot of audiophile equipment has a gimmicked sound that is not natural.
Mr Lin, Please listen to live music and see if you hear imaging and soundstage. Music in a concert hall does not sound like that.
You may believe that, but if you closed your eyes you could not localize instruments at all. The reverberant sound makes that impossible unless you are sitting right in the orchestra. You certainly cannot do that at a rock concert with amplified sound. Speakers that are beamy tend to produce a false sense of imaging. I have a $30 clock radio with an ambiance circuit that will blow you away with it's imaging when you throw the switch. It is a gimmick.
So, you are saying you recommend the Shure over the Ortofon for the OP?
That is what a good discussion is all about. Everyone has a perspective.
Mr Lin, Please listen to live unamplified music and see if you hear imaging and soundstage. Music in a concert hall does not sound like that. It sounds smooth refined somewhat diffuse. Sometimes it has bite sometimes it is laid back. It does not sound zippy of fat or thin. It sounds like a mass of instruments playing in a reverberant space. You hear the instruments and you hear the room good and bad.
