• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

What Year Did Solid-State Start Sounding Good?

I hooked up a Pioneer SX-626 ... and she kicks all the newer junk to the curb.

For me, the SS sweet spot is early to mid 70s. There is some direct coupled stuff that is great but the early cap coupled stuff just amazes.

:thumbsup:
 
None of you are even Close so far, I posted the correct answer on side 3
Nope. SS sounded "good" from jump right there in the mid 60's during the overlap. It had to or it wasn't going to sell. Got some of them right here in front of me.
Remember the tubes were right next to it on the shelves in the stores for comparison.
Some would say that when tubes went away and the available store a/b comparison went away the sound changed and went down hill. I'm not going there.
As for "GREATNESS", well that's a whole different subject and not what was asked.
 
Nope. SS sounded "good" from jump right there in the mid 60's during the overlap. It had to or it wasn't going to sell. Got some of them right here in front of me.
Remember the tubes were right next to it on the shelves in the stores for comparison.
Some would say that when tubes went away and the available store a/b comparison went away the sound changed and went down hill. I'm not going there.
As for "GREATNESS", well that's a whole different subject and not what was asked.


Ever heard of Tim? Or should I say TIM? Or negative feedback? SS did not perform until this was cured by Ottala. Read & learn:

https://www.google.dk/search?q=matti+ottala&ie=&oe=

http://www.electrocompaniet.com/about/history.html
 
The last Electrocompaniet amp I heard was driving a pair of B&W 803 D2s and the sound was amazing. I almost bought the amp but it's huge and wouldn't fit anywhere in my listening room aside from the floor.
I read about Ottala over on DIY audio and as usual there were people arguing this and that but John Curl said he still uses one of his early amps as his reference piece (this was back in '08 or so which may have changed by now).
 
The three oldest ones circa 65 are very capable receivers and sound very very good even in as is condition.
+1
It is rather interesting that the large number of posters appear to favor equipment contemporary to them rather than equipment from earlier manufacture.
 
You might want to check out a Luxman R-117 and a Pioneer VSX-9500S and the MX-1000....to consider when SS started to have an ominous sound.
 
+1
It is rather interesting that the large number of posters appear to favor equipment contemporary to them rather than equipment from earlier manufacture.
If they are quick to discount the early SS as unusable maybe it's because they don't have a wide range of good working units to compare as I do.
Right here in front of me, in the house, all at the same time. From 65 to 79. Not from memory of a friend of a friend had.........
Some of them are flat out impressive plain and simple. But only so good none the less.
 
You might want to check out a Luxman R-117 and a Pioneer VSX-9500S and the MX-1000....to consider when SS started to have an ominous sound.
Not familiar with them. 1990 right.? Were they good and getting better or the true beginning of bpc?
All I know about is what I have here.
 
We can probably ascribe the dawn of modern transistor amplification to the introduction of reliable stable silicon solid state.
Implementation is another associated factor.
If not mentioned previously, the Harman Kardon Citation 11 and 12 were milestones.
 
Not familiar with them. 1990 right.? Were they good and getting better or the true beginning of bpc?
All I know about is what I have here.

In the early 90’s there were certain top of the line models of equipment that exceeded the levels of prior technology. They were black and had metal faces. Black hard plastic was used in the cheaper models and since so many go for the cheaper models of equipment when making a purchase....90’s equipment got a bad rep. The best receivers of the early 90’s had to complete with the sound of the SX-1980 and that they did and some were even better like the Luxman R-117 or the VSX-D1S. But because they are not popular they have not suffered the popularity of price inflation. I think that better sound at a lower price beyond what it looks like is a no brainer, but you have to be beyond the monkey see monkey do crowd that likes shinny things !!!
 
Seems to me that designers had the bugs pretty well sorted out of solid state by the late '60's to early '70's. My Marantz 2245 (~1972) sounds mighty fine. I also have a diminutive Pioneer SA-500 integrated (circa 1971) that is one fine sounding 14 wpc of solid state goodness.
 
In the early 90’s there were certain top of the line models of equipment that exceeded the levels of prior technology. They were black and had metal faces. Black hard plastic was used in the cheaper models and since so many go for the cheaper models of equipment when making a purchase....90’s equipment got a bad rep. The best receivers of the early 90’s had to complete with the sound of the SX-1980 and that they did and some were even better like the Luxman R-117 or the VSX-D1S. But because they are not popular they have not suffered the popularity of price inflation. I think that better sound at a lower price beyond what it looks like is a no brainer, but you have to be beyond the monkey see monkey do crowd that likes shinny things !!!
Well I do think my old Pioneer Elite something or another sounded very good.
Would that have been a good unit at a price point?
 
Seems to me that designers had the bugs pretty well sorted out of solid state by the late '60's to early '70's. My Marantz 2245 (~1972) sounds mighty fine. I also have a diminutive Pioneer SA-500 integrated (circa 1971) that is one fine sounding 14 wpc of solid state goodness.
Sometimes I think the parts tech was behind the design tech
 
We can probably ascribe the dawn of modern transistor amplification to the introduction of reliable stable silicon solid state.
Implementation is another associated factor.
If not mentioned previously, the Harman Kardon Citation 11 and 12 were milestones.
I've restored a few germanium transistor units back to original specs......they sound wonderful as well, at least when they don't have a noisy transistor in the chain anyway. I think it has more to do with the amp's design than it does with what type of transistor it has. The KLH Model Sixteen is a wonderful sounding germanium amp, albeit a little on the fragile side when pushed hard. But, why would you want to push a 25watt amp hard in the first place? Just enjoy the music :)
 
Why would you want to get 100 watts out of a tube amp?

Sometimes, simply because its there. I have a pair of monos that do an honest 95 watts. I use well under 10 watts. I got them cheap and making them useful was a project that I enjoyed doing.
 
I have a Grundig SV 50, which was the world's first mass-produced solid state integrated amp, introduced in August 1963. It's 20 WPC, which is actually quite a lot considering its age, it handles 4 ohm speakers without any problems and it sounds really good, so I'd say solid state sounded good from the start - when done right.

f0686bfa66a3ca8b5ff2a67f08398592_big.jpg


da5d2d9ed85833902fa5a75ff1cd584d_big.jpg

That's mighty cool setup! As for earliest I believe Cerwin Vega made one of the first consumer offering SS amplifiers back in the 50s
 
Well we've definitely gone off-topic but I'm sure I'm far from the only one who disagrees with you... Jimi channeled an energy that very few can come close to, a shaman if you will. And that goes far beyond technique.

I liked Hendrix in his time. That shaman stuff you refer to sounds like the LSD, jimson weed and peyote he used. When your ****ed up, you can get into a real free form groove. Ask me how I know this, been playing 40 years now myself. A lot of his albums were not big sellers, only a few still stand the test of time and that is how it should be with any good musician. Some great, some good and some just mediocre tunes but Jimi rarely played sober so keep that in mind. I think drugs helped his creativity as he had no inhibitions when he was in a altered state
 
Back
Top Bottom