invaderzim
Super Member
Nice healthy looking ladies. Not like a lot of the "Anita Sammich" models.
-Dave
It has been a long week; I almost googled the name to see who you were referring to when it finally sunk in.
Nice healthy looking ladies. Not like a lot of the "Anita Sammich" models.
-Dave
I may be wrong, but I think that phrase is referring to the fact that most VU meters have a zone that is good, and then you're slamming into the VU "post" which is a physical limitation, and usually means distortion and brickwalled vocals.
Usually due to someone not knowing how to check their levels, and/or getting too loud while reading copy.
EDIT - no, I'm wrong, it's where you talk RIGHT UP to the point where the vocals kick in. My apologies, in the country format where I got my start, I was pretty good at that, and tried to avoid if the intro was exceptionally catchy, or integral to the song. Non musician types working in radio would talk damn near over it.
In the classic rock format, I NEVER did it. I let "the music do the talking".
I had that stuff down to a science, and did some good work, but I'm no @ChicagoTom. That dude is seriously good with copy. You've likely heard him, and just don't know it. Maybe he will chime in.
I had that stuff down to a science, and did some good work, but I'm no @ChicagoTom. That dude is seriously good with copy. You've likely heard him, and just don't know it. Maybe he will chime in.
I may be wrong, but I think that phrase is referring to the fact that most VU meters have a zone that is good, and then you're slamming into the VU "post" which is a physical limitation, and usually means distortion and brickwalled vocals.
Usually due to someone not knowing how to check their levels, and/or getting too loud while reading copy.
EDIT - no, I'm wrong, it's where you talk RIGHT UP to the point where the vocals kick in. My apologies, in the country format where I got my start, I was pretty good at that, and tried to avoid if the intro was exceptionally catchy, or integral to the song. Non musician types working in radio would talk damn near over it.
In the classic rock format, I NEVER did it. I let "the music do the talking".
I had that stuff down to a science, and did some good work, but I'm no @ChicagoTom. That dude is seriously good with copy. You've likely heard him, and just don't know it. Maybe he will chime in.
Thanks for the kinds words, James!
There is an explanation for why commercials are worse than ever.
When I got into the voice-over business in 1989, cable TV had just gotten a foothold. I missed the "Golden Age" of my profession, when you only had a handful of broadcast networks that EVERYBODY watched, and if you voiced 2 nationally-viewed commercials, you could buy a house from the residuals and pay cash. But cable TV introduced dozens, then hundreds of new stations, and the effectiveness of any one commercial was highly diluted compared to when you KNEW you'd get eyeballs on any given spot in the past.
THEN the VCR was introduced, along with the concept of "time-shifting," meaning you watch your shows WHEN you want to watch them and you fast forward through the commercials. A bit clunky with the controls on a VCR, but it effectively enabled you to watch show and NOT watch TV commercials. Time-shifting when into high gear with the advent of TiVo and the DVRs everyone has now.
Bottom line is, the effectiveness of a high-budget, well-written and well-made TV commercial has drastically declined. Meaning companies won't spend the bucks to make them GOOD anymore. Also, the Millennial generation is VERY sensitive about feeling like they are "being sold to." They tune out anything that smacks of that. And a voice that sounds very smooth and articulate - like I can do - is actually a BAD THING. They would much rather hear from someone who does NOT sound like a professional. "Emily from Accounting" or "Liam from the graphics department" or better yet, "Joe from down the street" is who they want to hear from.
(I make no judgement that this is a bad thing by the way, it's just bad for me and my career!)
Now you'd THINK that radio advertising would still be going strong, since there's no DVR type tech for radios, right? Yeah, but there's this thing called "streaming" and only older folks listen to radio very much anymore. And besides, there has been so much consolidation of ownership in radio the past few decades, and as a result, enormous cost-cutting, that now MOST of the spots I hear on the radio are voiced by a person on staff who is paid peanuts (and is often shockingly bad, as with our local news radio station here in Chicago).
Now I have adapted somewhat. I am on the roster of a major music-streaming company (can't say anything more), and if you have a free account with them, you might even have heard me there. I was making a ton of money with them through sheer volume for several years. But now, they've hired ON-STAFF voice talent to crank out spots even cheaper than I did (and the rates I was accepting were already very low by my historical standards already!). And my work with them has plummeted 80%. I just hope my business can be viable another decade or so before I can retire.
So in a nutshell, commercials suck more than ever because the budgets to make them good aren't there, due to 2 factors: 1) they are nowhere near as effective as they used to be, and 2) a younger generation who actively dislikes anything that seems "polished" or "professional" because that means they are being sold to.
I'm a first-pressing, virgin vinyl talent... in an MP3 market.
www.tomest.com
In the same vein- "You got this." It is so ubiquitous anymore.I watched the first one and a half seconds of a commercial today at CNN which started with the heading "WE SPEAK FUTURE".
I do not know what the commercial was about, maybe a sort of investment bank. It makes me angry and sad to see again and again that especially commercials got such a power, such a sustainable impact to undermine and therefore destroy our languages.
Have you ever seen the 1990 movie "Crazy People" with Dudley Moore? "Buy a car, get a blow job"You should hear the Ferrari ads on WBBM, tho' I find them somehow amusing.
Kind of like Cadillac and Chevy. But in both cases it is a little more than just a rebadgeThey are not a re-badged Toyota.
Agree with this sentiment. In particular, I hate the new commercial that has a finger with John Goodman's head grafted on it hawking a "free" gaming site. There's no such thing.Commercials I hate, any that promote gambling in a way that suggests ordinary people look forward to participating, (maybe as soon as they get home from work, and before doing anything else), and are so much happier when gambling than when they are not.- patently ridiculous.
I have to admit I also like the them, as well as some of the Lincoln adds, but they do message "hey! we are so entitled. Screw you if you can't afford one of these!"Kind of like Cadillac and Chevy. But in both cases it is a little more than just a rebadge![]()